1989
DOI: 10.1518/107118189786759651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riding Mower Control Placement Guideline Development

Abstract: Accident investigations and subsequent hazard analysis studies of power mower accidents conducted by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), indicated that the current version of the American National Standard for Turf Care Equipment - Power Lawn Mowers, Lawn and Garden Tractors, and Lawn Tractors - Safety Specifications (ANSI/OPEI B71.1-1986) might benefit from review and/or revision. The analyses indicated control activation, placement and/or operation may have contributed to a number of the accidents… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous research has studied RLE usability (Heasly et al, 1989;Yadav and Tewari, 1998;Syuaib et al, 2003), including international and domestic usability standards and guidelines. However, no study has developed systematic and repeatable usability evaluation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some previous research has studied RLE usability (Heasly et al, 1989;Yadav and Tewari, 1998;Syuaib et al, 2003), including international and domestic usability standards and guidelines. However, no study has developed systematic and repeatable usability evaluation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have attempted to create standardized RLE evaluation recommendations by reviewing guidelines, accident reports, and interviewing users to develop updated standards (Heasly et al, 1989). This research represents a different approach to conducting an RLE evaluation; however, a comprehensive literature search revealed no usability standards based evaluation tools specific to RLEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%