(Ziegler, 1978 and this volume) and the adjacent margins of the North Atlantic Ocean.It has become clear that extension may also occur in strike slip and convergent settings (Bally & Snelson, 1979), and examples include the Western Mediterranean (Biju-Duval et al., 1977) , the Pannonian Basin (Royden & Sclater, 1981) and the Great Basin (Profett, 1977).The occurrence of crustal extension, expressed by rifting, in these different geological settings emphasises that very little is known of the mechanisms producing the rifting process, including its initiation, which cause the profound changes in crustal structure revealed by attenuation and ultimately by the formation of a spreading ocean basin. . "Several innovative theoretical models (McKenzie, 1978;Royden et al., 1980;Royden and Keen, 1980; Sclater & Christie, 1981;Turcotte, 1981) have proposed mechanisms for lithospheric extension and have attempted to evaluate quantitatively the mechanical and thermal consequences of each model in terms of histories of margin and basin subsidence. These models may have a potential practical value in predicting the thermal history and thus the degree of.hydrocarbon maturity in sedimentary basins formed in response to a lithospheric extension (Royden & Keen, 1980;Royden et al., 1980;Sclater & Christie, 1980). However, a rigorous description of the deep crustal structure beneath a cratonic sedimentary basin or a passive continental margin that would provide sufficient data to quantify the extension in order to constrain these models has been lacking as has a comprehensive study of the geological and thermal history of basins that have evolved in response to lithospheric extension.In this paper, we present some of the results of a detail seismic refraction and reflection study of the northern or Armorican margin of the Bay of Biscay. The study examined the deep crustal structure (Montadert, Roberts et al., 1977;Montadert et al. , 1979). -The overall tectonic style consists of tilted and rotated fault blocks whose downthrow is consistently down toward the ocean. The pattern of faults is probably en-echelon or anastomosing. Many of the fault blocks are bounded by listric normal faults ( Fig. 2a) with throws of up to 3000 m. The listric faults flatten out with depth close to the top of a sub-horizontal group of reflectors called 'S' (Fig. 2b). Comparison with early refraction data suggested that this reflector corresponded to the boundary between a 4.9 and 6.3 km.sec ^ layer (Avedik & Howard, 1979). De Charpal et al. (1979 and Montadert et al. (1979) interpreted the 6.3 km. sec ^ refractor as the boundary between the upper brittle and the lower ductile continental crust. Refraction data on the shelf (Holder & Bott, 1971) suggested that the Moho shoaled from 25 km beneath the shelf break to 12 km near the continent-ocean transition where, from the available refraction data, the observed ductile crust was estimated to be only 3 km -2-in thickness. These early results showed that the observed thinning of the crust could not be ful...