2013
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Right Door,” wrong floor: A canine deficiency in navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the compression observed in the horizontal plane can be related to general effects in magnitude estimation such as the regression effect [ 32 ], the vertical stretching shows quite the opposite tendency. Questions arise as to how to interpret these results with respect to the anisotropy of a weaker performance of navigation in the vertical versus the horizontal dimension, which was described in rodents [ 4 , 7 ], dogs [ 12 ], and humans [ 13 ]. PET measurements in the latter study showed increased glucose metabolism in the right hippocampus, bilateral retrosplenial cortex, and pontine tegmentum during horizontal navigation [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the compression observed in the horizontal plane can be related to general effects in magnitude estimation such as the regression effect [ 32 ], the vertical stretching shows quite the opposite tendency. Questions arise as to how to interpret these results with respect to the anisotropy of a weaker performance of navigation in the vertical versus the horizontal dimension, which was described in rodents [ 4 , 7 ], dogs [ 12 ], and humans [ 13 ]. PET measurements in the latter study showed increased glucose metabolism in the right hippocampus, bilateral retrosplenial cortex, and pontine tegmentum during horizontal navigation [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current study on 3-D orientation and spatial memory in humans was stimulated by an accidental observation made in dogs living for several days with their owners in a multilevel hotel [ 12 ]. The dogs had difficulties finding the right floor but correctly ran to the corresponding “right door” on the “wrong floor”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improvement has been attributed to the increased cost associated with moving vertically: because moving vertically is much harder, animals are motivated to minimise the errors made in that dimension. This is supported by many experiments demonstrating that localisation of the horizontal coordinate of a goal is usually better than its vertical coordinate (Brandt and Dieterich 2013;Brandt et al 2015;Zwergal et al 2016). The exception to this are animals that can move in all dimensions with equal effort, such as fish (Holbrook and Burt de Perera 2013) and hummingbirds (Hurly et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, this difference could have arisen from reduced attention to visual landmarks during vertical navigation. It has also been reported that dogs correctly remembered horizontal locations within a floor but not the vertical floor itself ( Brandt and Dieterich 2013 ). However, it is not clear whether the dogs’ navigation errors were due to inherent differences in vertical and horizontal encoding, or because of unequal landmark information consequent upon a lack of visual and odour controls in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%