2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right heart strain assessment on CTPA following acute pulmonary embolism: Interobserver variability between expert radiologists and physicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both reviews were based on low to very low-quality evidence which limits confidence in their findings. Some primary studies have shown high concordance between radiologists and non-radiologists such as the reporting of abnormalities assessed with head CTs ( Gallagher et al 2011 ), interpretation of whole-body CT scans in trauma patients ( Parag & Hardcastle 2020 ) and the interpretation of CT pulmonary angiograms for heart strain ( Samaranayake et al 2022 ). The evidence base for CT brain scan interpretation by non-radiologists is therefore not conclusive but recent single studies indicate potential.…”
Section: What Is the Evidence For Interpretation Of Images By Non-rad...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both reviews were based on low to very low-quality evidence which limits confidence in their findings. Some primary studies have shown high concordance between radiologists and non-radiologists such as the reporting of abnormalities assessed with head CTs ( Gallagher et al 2011 ), interpretation of whole-body CT scans in trauma patients ( Parag & Hardcastle 2020 ) and the interpretation of CT pulmonary angiograms for heart strain ( Samaranayake et al 2022 ). The evidence base for CT brain scan interpretation by non-radiologists is therefore not conclusive but recent single studies indicate potential.…”
Section: What Is the Evidence For Interpretation Of Images By Non-rad...mentioning
confidence: 99%