2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/5601509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right Hemisphere Grey Matter Volume and Language Functions in Stroke Aphasia

Abstract: The role of the right hemisphere (RH) in recovery from aphasia is incompletely understood. The present study quantified RH grey matter (GM) volume in individuals with chronic stroke-induced aphasia and cognitively healthy people using voxel-based morphometry. We compared group differences in GM volume in the entire RH and in RH regions-of-interest. Given that lesion site is a critical source of heterogeneity associated with poststroke language ability, we used voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) to exami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
16
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be that this region is engaged only in limited circumstances, as we argued above for left inferior frontal cortical regions (including the left insula), though whether these noncanonical sentences elicit activity in this region because of difficult prosody (as has been suggested for right inferior frontal cortex; Friederici, 2011) or for other reasons remains to be determined. As a second point, the engagement of this region in the comprehension of complex sentences in healthy individuals is consistent with the hypothesis that this region (and nearby and/or functionally connected regions) might be capable of contributing to the recovery of comprehension of complex sentences in individuals with agrammatic aphasia, though precisely how and to what extent is still an active area of investigation (Gainotti, 2015;Lukic et al, 2017).…”
Section: Noncanonical Sentence Comprehensionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It may be that this region is engaged only in limited circumstances, as we argued above for left inferior frontal cortical regions (including the left insula), though whether these noncanonical sentences elicit activity in this region because of difficult prosody (as has been suggested for right inferior frontal cortex; Friederici, 2011) or for other reasons remains to be determined. As a second point, the engagement of this region in the comprehension of complex sentences in healthy individuals is consistent with the hypothesis that this region (and nearby and/or functionally connected regions) might be capable of contributing to the recovery of comprehension of complex sentences in individuals with agrammatic aphasia, though precisely how and to what extent is still an active area of investigation (Gainotti, 2015;Lukic et al, 2017).…”
Section: Noncanonical Sentence Comprehensionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Supporting this possibility, changes in lateralization as a compensatory mechanism has been described in Alzheimer Disease (Fallgatter et al., ), Mild Cognitive Impairment (Yeung et al., ) and Schizophrenia (Sommer, Ramsey, & Kahn, ; Weiss et al., ); whereas the increased of right hemisphere GMV in classical left‐lateralized language areas has been associated with better language comprehension in aphasic patients (Lukic et al., ). However, compensatory reorganization of cognitive functions in SCA7 should be explored further, since other mechanisms as increased functional connectivity has been suggested (Hernandez‐Castillo et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Considering the clear-cut multidimensionality of aphasia and its neural underpinnings, it is no surprise that multidimensional approaches have been growing in prevalence and prominence over the last few years. Disentangling multiple behavioral and neural variables requires large datasets, so it is encouraging that the field of language neuroscience is becoming increasingly collaborative, with the emergence of a number of large scale projects that will generate datasets of the size and substance that will form a sound basis for future progress [32,[93][94][95].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%