2018
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right on the money? The contingent effects of strategic orientation and pay system design on firm performance

Abstract: Research Summary: This article extends prior research on the performance implications of the fit between a firm's strategic orientation and its pay system design. Whereas prior research has shown that matching the pay system design to the strategic orientation of the firm generally contributes to higher performance, most studies have examined the pay systems of the upper echelons and employees separately. Based on an analysis that accounts for both horizontal and vertical pay dispersion, we find that, whereas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite early calls for research on adaptive strategy implementation (e.g., Lindblom 1959;Quinn, 1978Quinn, , 1980Quinn, , 1981, the structural control view largely dominated the literature throughout the 1980s and 1990s. Even today, it is not uncommon for strategy researchers approach the topic area with a similar framing (e.g., Kiss & Barr, 2017;Tenhiälä & Laamanen, 2018).…”
Section: Review Of Traditional Strategy Implementation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite early calls for research on adaptive strategy implementation (e.g., Lindblom 1959;Quinn, 1978Quinn, , 1980Quinn, , 1981, the structural control view largely dominated the literature throughout the 1980s and 1990s. Even today, it is not uncommon for strategy researchers approach the topic area with a similar framing (e.g., Kiss & Barr, 2017;Tenhiälä & Laamanen, 2018).…”
Section: Review Of Traditional Strategy Implementation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of contingency theory in strategy implementation research has reduced over time, due to the growing popularity of more adaptive conceptions of strategy and structure, researchers have continued to use contingency theory to study specific questions relating to the fit of different types of strategies with different aspects of structure, controls, or incentives. For example, research on on the role of incentives has examined how incentive system design characteristics, such as individual incentives (Shaw et al, 2001) or vertical or horizontal pay dispersion (Tenhiälä & Laamanen, 2018), fit with different strategy types and how this fit influences the effectiveness of implementation.…”
Section: Main Theories Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also we follow recent literature that uses this framework: e.g. research explored the strategic types in Poland to performance (Ingram et al , 2016), in The Netherlands in regard to customer orientation and performance (Frambach, Fiss and Ingenbleek, 2016), in China to performance (Luo and Park, 2001), in Saudi Arabia and how culture effects the strategic orientation (Robertson et al , 2015), how ownership type of a firm in China will be related to the strategic orientation (Peng et al , 2004), how the typology can be more effectively measured by a balanced scorecard in Iran (Khani and Ahmadi, 2012), how pay systems will differ based upon strategic orientation in Finland (Tenhiälä and Laamanen, 2018), how the framework can be used through a real options approach (Riley and Hogan, 2016), performance and JVs in China (Luo et al , 2001), business ties and strategic orientation in China (Lee, 2019), etc.…”
Section: Hypotheses Development Relative To Translating Knowledge Into Global Business Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from overall staff salary, we also tried to separately measure managerial and nonmanagerial staff salary given our interest in outcomes to address the existence of vertical and horizontal pay dispersion in firms [27,28]. As firms might want to control or even reduce pay for nonmanagerial staff or nonskilled labor, it is more reasonable to distinguish managerial and nonmanagerial staff remuneration in separate measurements to avoid plausible mixed effects.…”
Section: Identification Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%