2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right Target, Wrong Mechanism? Agricultural Modernization and Poverty Reduction in Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhancing a supportive social foundation provides the groundwork from which members of such groups can collectively diversify their activities, especially where social capital is more readily available than financial capital. Indeed participation in such groups is an important mechanism through which households receive formal support, for example, through the National Agricultural Advisory Service, NAADS (see further discussion in Bahiigwa et al 2005;Osbahr et al 2011). …”
Section: Implications For Coping and Adaptation Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhancing a supportive social foundation provides the groundwork from which members of such groups can collectively diversify their activities, especially where social capital is more readily available than financial capital. Indeed participation in such groups is an important mechanism through which households receive formal support, for example, through the National Agricultural Advisory Service, NAADS (see further discussion in Bahiigwa et al 2005;Osbahr et al 2011). …”
Section: Implications For Coping and Adaptation Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Uganda, dairy cattle play a key role in the nutrition, of most households with per capita milk consumption of about 58 litres [4] against FAO requirement of 200 litres per person per year [5]. While annual average milk yield per cow per lactation per year of 305 days in developed countries can go above 8000 kg, less than 2000 kg is obtainable from pure dairy breeds, 1000 from cross breeds and 500 kg from indigenous cows in Uganda [6]. These statistics are obviously distressing in light of the rapidly growing human population at a rate of 3.2% annually [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Francis and James (2003) and Bahiigwa, Rigby and Woodhouse (2005) argue that decentralized governments in Uganda, often captured by local elites, are not independent or accountable to voters, and so are not useful tools for poverty reduction. Samoff (1990) asserts that decentralization reforms around the world have mostly failed, and finds the evidence on responsiveness strongly negative.…”
Section: Literature Review: Institutions Accountability and Social Dmentioning
confidence: 99%