2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811465115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right temporal alpha oscillations as a neural mechanism for inhibiting obvious associations

Abstract: Creative cognition requires mental exploration of remotely connected concepts while suppressing dominant ones. Across four experiments using different samples of participants, we provide evidence that right temporal alpha oscillations play a crucial role in inhibiting habitual thinking modes, thereby paving the way for accessing more remote ideas. In the first experiment, participants completed the compound remote associate task (RAT) in three separate sessions: during right temporal alpha (10 Hz) transcranial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This internal focus of attention has a clear neurophysiological signature as evidenced by eye-behavior changes reflecting perceptual decoupling and visual disengagement ( Annerer-Walcher et al, 2018 ), increased electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha activity especially in the frontal and right parietal regions ( Benedek et al, 2014 ), and reduced visual network activity paired with increased right parietal brain activation ( Benedek et al, 2016 ). Increases of EEG alpha activity are a particularly robust finding in creativity research ( Lustenberger et al, 2015 ; Luft et al, 2018 ; Agnoli et al, 2020 ; for reviews, see Fink and Benedek, 2014 ; Stevens and Zabelina, 2019 ), representing inhibition of task-irrelevant (sensory) processing ( Jensen et al, 2012 ; Klimesch, 2012 ), which appears crucial for sustained internally directed activities involving imagination and mental simulation. Indeed, musicians were found to exhibit increased frontal upper alpha-band activity during musical improvisation compared with rote playback ( Lopata et al, 2017 ); in contrast, more accurate learning of new musical structures was associated with lower alpha power, potentially suggesting that less internal focus is necessary when retrieving more automatized procedures ( Zioga et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Creative Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This internal focus of attention has a clear neurophysiological signature as evidenced by eye-behavior changes reflecting perceptual decoupling and visual disengagement ( Annerer-Walcher et al, 2018 ), increased electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha activity especially in the frontal and right parietal regions ( Benedek et al, 2014 ), and reduced visual network activity paired with increased right parietal brain activation ( Benedek et al, 2016 ). Increases of EEG alpha activity are a particularly robust finding in creativity research ( Lustenberger et al, 2015 ; Luft et al, 2018 ; Agnoli et al, 2020 ; for reviews, see Fink and Benedek, 2014 ; Stevens and Zabelina, 2019 ), representing inhibition of task-irrelevant (sensory) processing ( Jensen et al, 2012 ; Klimesch, 2012 ), which appears crucial for sustained internally directed activities involving imagination and mental simulation. Indeed, musicians were found to exhibit increased frontal upper alpha-band activity during musical improvisation compared with rote playback ( Lopata et al, 2017 ); in contrast, more accurate learning of new musical structures was associated with lower alpha power, potentially suggesting that less internal focus is necessary when retrieving more automatized procedures ( Zioga et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Creative Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other causes could be, as pointed out by our reviewers, differences in the instructions/explanation of the task, in participants' motivations, in the study setting (e.g., fMRI scanner/EEG, etc. ), in other tasks performed during the same session, and in whether solution feedback was given, and, also, the associations between the items themselves might affect the difficulty (Luft et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the 172 researches, ten studies explored the remote associative process. These studies mainly focused on how memory affects remote association, such as semantic search, memory retrieval, and prior knowledge (Davelaar, 2015;Klein and Badia, 2015;Kajić et al, 2017), and on aspects of the brain mechanisms underlying the formation of remote associations, such as brain networks, brain structure, brain function, and brain waves (Wu et al, 2016;Bendetowicz et al, 2017Bendetowicz et al, , 2018Di et al, 2018;Pick and Lavidor, 2019;Zhou et al, 2019). In addition, some studies examined the effects of priming on remote association (Sassenberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Remote Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%