2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61410-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right to health care for vulnerable migrants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to not knowing what support might be available, whether it be in the form of special activities, housing or even free food provided by local organisations, arbitrariness was illustrated by the prospect of removal from the UK and being unable to exercise one's rights before the courts and the police. Although others have drawn attention to the arbitrary application of law and policy*for example in the inconsistent case of removals and access to healthcare (Anya 2007;Hargreaves and Burnett 2008;National Audit Office 2009)*this study records how the selective application of such procedures may give rise to fear and further mistrust of the state. Some participants felt that the state had deliberately conspired against them, for instance by denying them access to their children or by dispersing them to distant cities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to not knowing what support might be available, whether it be in the form of special activities, housing or even free food provided by local organisations, arbitrariness was illustrated by the prospect of removal from the UK and being unable to exercise one's rights before the courts and the police. Although others have drawn attention to the arbitrary application of law and policy*for example in the inconsistent case of removals and access to healthcare (Anya 2007;Hargreaves and Burnett 2008;National Audit Office 2009)*this study records how the selective application of such procedures may give rise to fear and further mistrust of the state. Some participants felt that the state had deliberately conspired against them, for instance by denying them access to their children or by dispersing them to distant cities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In April 2008, the High Court ruled that it was unreasonable for doctors to assess the immigration status of patients and therefore raised the prospect that refused asylum-seekers could enjoy free access to the National Health Service. In practice, however, the High Court ruling changed little and historically refused asylum-seekers found it exceptionally difficult to receive treatment, especially antenatal care (Anya 2007). Those who managed to receive care, including HIV treatment, were later billed thousands of pounds and hence treated as if they were non-nationals who were ineligible for free treatment (Hargreaves and Burnett 2008).…”
Section: Profile Of Refused Asylum-seekersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around the globe, debates about unauthorized im/migrants’“deservingness”—or lack thereof—are ubiquitous in popular, policy, and NGO discussions of unauthorized im/migration and health. Although a handful of bioethicists have begun to contemplate the dilemmas associated with “illegality” and deservingness in a philosophical idiom (e.g., Coyle 2003; Dwyer 2004) and some clinicians have begun to debate these questions in medical journals (Anya 2007; Arnold et al 2008; Kullgren 2008; Virgilio et al 2007), few medical anthropologists—or other social scientists of health—have paid it serious ethnographic attention to date (cf. Chavez 2008; Grove and Zwi 2006; Horton 2004; Ruiz‐Casares et al 2010; Willen forthcoming‐a, forthcoming‐b).…”
Section: Theorizing Unauthorized Im/migration and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%