2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right unilateral spatial neglect in aphasic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the prevalence of aphasia was similar for their acute LH stroke patients with (91%) and without (86%) neglect (p=0.71). Furthermore, the relationship between aphasic deficits and deficits of spatial attention might depend on the type of test (e.g., language-based or not), as Ihori and colleagues recently reported an association between aphasia severity and the degree of leftward deviations in an auditory pointing task based on word and sentence comprehension (Ihori, Kashiwagi, & Kashiwagi, 2015). However, in our sample of LH stroke patients the use of linguistic (letters) versus non-linguistic (meaningless symbols) stimuli in the two cancellation subtests of the MWCT did not affect test sensitivity for spatial inattention (see table 2).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the prevalence of aphasia was similar for their acute LH stroke patients with (91%) and without (86%) neglect (p=0.71). Furthermore, the relationship between aphasic deficits and deficits of spatial attention might depend on the type of test (e.g., language-based or not), as Ihori and colleagues recently reported an association between aphasia severity and the degree of leftward deviations in an auditory pointing task based on word and sentence comprehension (Ihori, Kashiwagi, & Kashiwagi, 2015). However, in our sample of LH stroke patients the use of linguistic (letters) versus non-linguistic (meaningless symbols) stimuli in the two cancellation subtests of the MWCT did not affect test sensitivity for spatial inattention (see table 2).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It must be added that these patients also had larger lesions, but a mutual mechanism of function might underlie this correlation. Similarly, left-hemispheric temporo-frontal areas, essential to language processing and meaningful planning of higher motor tasks, might also hold a key role in spatial attention (Suchan and Karnath 2011;Ihori et al 2015).…”
Section: The Left Hemisphere and Spatial Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The converse of this phenomenonright neglect in individuals with left-hemisphere damage and aphasia-is less common (Beis et al, 2004). However, despite this, a number of studies have noted some degree of decreased attention to stimuli presented on the right in PWA (Bouma & Ansink, 1988;Ihori, Kashiwagi, & Kashiwagi, 2015;Marshall, Basilakos, & Love-Myers, 2013;Petry, Crosson, Rothi, Bauer, & Schauer, 1994;Shisler, 2005).…”
Section: Motivation For Investigating Em and Im In Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%