“…2 As suggested by Dandel and Hetzer we herein assessed the correlation between RVES b/a ratio and the indexed PVR (PVRi), which was found to be significant (ρ = −0.571, P < 0.001). Furthermore, S 0 showed a significant negative correlation with mPAP (ρ = −0.428, P = 0.009) and PVRi (ρ = −0.451, P = 0.003), TAPSE had a negative correlation only with PVRi (ρ = −0.439, P = 0.004), while TAPSE and mPAP only showed a trend toward a negative correlation (ρ = −0.291, P = 0.085), suggesting that single systolic RV function parameters such as the TAPSE or S`cannot provide a detailed information on RV function and hemodynamics of the patient.In agreement with our recent findings and recommendations, [2][3][4] Dandel and Hetzer suggest to use the RVES b/a ratio in combination with more established measures of RV function, and the authors explain the advantages of a multi-parameter analysis to assess myocardial changes under pathological conditions (as evident in PAH), where parallel measurements of the load-dependency of RV size, geometry, and pump function prove useful for a detailed RV evaluation. 1 Other integrative approaches using different combinations of parameters also included data on RV afterload.…”