2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment in Congenital Heart Disease Using CMR Compressed-Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging

Abstract: Background and objective: To evaluate the reliability of compressed-sensing (CS) real-time single-breath-hold cine imaging for quantification of right ventricular (RV) function and volumes in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients in comparison with the standard multi-breath-hold technique. Methods: Sixty-one consecutive CHD patients (mean age = 22.2 ± 9.0 (SD) years) were prospectively evaluated during either the initial work-up or after repair. For each patient, two series of cine images were acquired: firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CS technique has successfully shortened cine imaging in half the time compared to conventional cine sequences, while still maintaining comparable volumetric values (12). A series of previous studies have consistently validated its effectiveness in evaluating cardiac volume among patients with various kinds of CVDs (13)(14)(15). Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of CS technology in CMR cine, a lack of established standards for image acquisition and interpretation, as well as variability introduced by various software vendors, necessitates further research to comprehensively understand the differences in strain values between conventional cine and CS-based cine (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CS technique has successfully shortened cine imaging in half the time compared to conventional cine sequences, while still maintaining comparable volumetric values (12). A series of previous studies have consistently validated its effectiveness in evaluating cardiac volume among patients with various kinds of CVDs (13)(14)(15). Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of CS technology in CMR cine, a lack of established standards for image acquisition and interpretation, as well as variability introduced by various software vendors, necessitates further research to comprehensively understand the differences in strain values between conventional cine and CS-based cine (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%