Right-wing populism and the dynamics of style: a discourse-analytic perspective on mediated political performances

Abstract

This article offers new ways of conceptualising style in right wing populist communicative performances, by foregrounding a structured and conceptually informed use of "style" that moves beyond the descriptive sense routinely employed in political communication. Specifically, it explores how a discourse-analytic approach to mediated populist discourse can inform and advance the current understanding of populist 'style' by analysing some contextually produced linguistic and discursive choices in populist rhetorical repertoires -i.e., the communicative strategies that are deployed in mediated contexts for right-wing populist political communication. Taking three illustrative examples of right wing populist party performances on TV news and current affairs broadcasts in Greece (GD), France (FN) and the UK (UKIP), the speakers' use of a range of rhetorical devices is examined using models from socio-linguistics and discourse analysis: aspects of register shifts by GD in blame attribution speeches, interactional 'bad manners' in a French political debate, and Nigel Farage speaking 'candidly' in three different contexts of news reporting from the UK. In taking such a qualitative approach, it is argued that populist style cannot be defined in terms of one single feature, or set of features, common to all right wing populists and transferrable from one socio-cultural context to another, but more usefully as a set of motivated choices among alternative semiotic resources (linguistic/discursive, interactional and visual), which have social and cultural resonance. This focus on micro-level features of mediated interaction thus offers a more fine-grained understanding of style than is currently the case, as it shows how right-wing populist politicians' performative styles are situated within specific (here European) socio-cultural and political communicative contexts; in this study, this is to say, the various television broadcasts in which they occur.

A Cultural Sociology of Populism

“…These kind of difficulties have led some to jettison the notion of populism as ideology-be it thin-or thick-centred-entirely, and argue that it is not an "actor-level" phenomenon, but a "speech-level" one, revealing how "politicians often rely on populist language selectively, presenting the same political claims in either populist or non-populist terms depending on the audience and broader social context" (Bonikowski 2016: p. 13). Whether this involves arguing that populism is more akin to a "discourse" (Aslanidis 2016), a "rhetorical strategy" (Bonikowski 2016), a "style" (Ekström et al 2018), a "stylistic repertoire" (Brubaker 2017), or a "frame" (Aslanidis 2018), this alternative perspective recognizes that populism refers more to the form through which politics is done, than to any specific ideological content. Seeing populism in this way ties it to appearance; impression; aesthetics; and, importantly, performance (Moffitt 2016).…”

Masculinity in the Age of (Philippine) Populism: Spectacle, Hypermasculinity, and Rodrigo Duterte

“…We use selected excerpts from his political speeches and interviews as part of our "semiotic resource" (Van Leeuwen, 2008, p. 150). We take our cue from scholars who have employed a similar approach in making a cultural analysis of populist discourse from a wide variety of socio-political contexts (Ekström et al, 2018;Tambar, 2009;MCS -Masculinities and Social Change, 269 Mason, 2006). These semiotic resources will be unpacked through the framework of hegemonic masculinity (Connell, 1995;Connell & Messerschmidt, 2005, MacInnes, 1998.Our understanding of hypermasculinity was derived from Mosher and Sirkin's "hypermasculinity inventory" (1984, p. 150).…”

Populists and planners: ‘We are the people. Who are you?’*

“…Below is a division of populist stylistic features into five clusters, each briefly compared with the CPT ideal. Several authors apply these descriptive clusters (Aalberg et al, 2017;Ekström et al, 2018;Taggart, 2000: 94):…”