2017
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.25.2436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Righting past wrongs: A superintendent’s social justice leadership for dual language education along the U.S.-Mexico border

Abstract: Abstract:The role of superintendents in adopting and developing dual language education and other equity-oriented reforms that support the unique needs of Latina/o emergent bilinguals is a relatively unexplored area in educational leadership and policy resea rch. Drawing upon theories of social justice leadership, this article examines how one superintendent in the El Paso Independent School District (EPISD) engaged in leadership to address injustices against Mexican and Mexican-American emergent bilinguals th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies document how accountability policies, at times, triggered: (a) teaching to the test, narrowing curriculum, and the de-professionalizing the teaching profession (Dee & Jacob, 2011;Reback, Rockoff, & Schwartz, 2014;Valli & Buese, 2007;Watanabe, 2007); (b) a medical model approach to identifying students deemed just below performance cut-offs (commonly referred to as "bubble kids") and "treating" them via targeted "interventions" at the expense of both lower and higher performing students (Amrein-Beardsley, 2009;Booher-Jennings, 2005;Nichols & Berliner, 2005); (c) a loss of trust with families coupled with a growing sense of disengagement in educational governance processes (Rhodes, 2015); (d) harsh and exclusionary disciplinary policies that prioritize compliance and docility to minimize classroom disruption or the strategic discipline of low-performing students during testing windows (Figlio, 2006;Thompson & Allen, 2012); (e) reshaping student testing pools by removing, improperly promoting or demoting students, or pushing students out of school (Cullen & Reback, 2006;Vasquez Heilig & Darling-Hammond, 2008); (f) teacher turnover (Clotfelter, Ladd, Vigdor, & Diaz, 2004;Feng, Figlio, & Sass, 2018); and (g) cheating or tampering with testing materials (Amrein-Beardsley, Berliner, & Rideau, 2010. The media and law enforcement agencies have examined numerous instances of cheating. For example, a former superintendent of the El Paso Independent School District (EPISD) was convicted with several district and school-based administrators for participating in a cheating scheme where students of Mexican descent (many of whom were English Language Learners (ELLs) were improperly promoted, demoted, or pushed out of school to avoid taking standardized tests (DeMatthews, Izquierdo, & Knight, 2017;El Paso Times, 2017). In Atlanta, teachers and administrators were convicted and sent to prison for participating in a cheating scandal that inflated test scores (Blinder, 2015).…”
Section: Logic and Outcomes Of State Accountability Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies document how accountability policies, at times, triggered: (a) teaching to the test, narrowing curriculum, and the de-professionalizing the teaching profession (Dee & Jacob, 2011;Reback, Rockoff, & Schwartz, 2014;Valli & Buese, 2007;Watanabe, 2007); (b) a medical model approach to identifying students deemed just below performance cut-offs (commonly referred to as "bubble kids") and "treating" them via targeted "interventions" at the expense of both lower and higher performing students (Amrein-Beardsley, 2009;Booher-Jennings, 2005;Nichols & Berliner, 2005); (c) a loss of trust with families coupled with a growing sense of disengagement in educational governance processes (Rhodes, 2015); (d) harsh and exclusionary disciplinary policies that prioritize compliance and docility to minimize classroom disruption or the strategic discipline of low-performing students during testing windows (Figlio, 2006;Thompson & Allen, 2012); (e) reshaping student testing pools by removing, improperly promoting or demoting students, or pushing students out of school (Cullen & Reback, 2006;Vasquez Heilig & Darling-Hammond, 2008); (f) teacher turnover (Clotfelter, Ladd, Vigdor, & Diaz, 2004;Feng, Figlio, & Sass, 2018); and (g) cheating or tampering with testing materials (Amrein-Beardsley, Berliner, & Rideau, 2010. The media and law enforcement agencies have examined numerous instances of cheating. For example, a former superintendent of the El Paso Independent School District (EPISD) was convicted with several district and school-based administrators for participating in a cheating scheme where students of Mexican descent (many of whom were English Language Learners (ELLs) were improperly promoted, demoted, or pushed out of school to avoid taking standardized tests (DeMatthews, Izquierdo, & Knight, 2017;El Paso Times, 2017). In Atlanta, teachers and administrators were convicted and sent to prison for participating in a cheating scandal that inflated test scores (Blinder, 2015).…”
Section: Logic and Outcomes Of State Accountability Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be a courageous leader for DLBE, it is first necessary to develop one’s knowledge base about bilingual education and bilingualism, which is often lacking among educational leaders (DeMatthews et al, 2017; Morita-Mullaney, 2019). Such leaders are better positioned to hire other educators who likewise understand bilingualism and the experiences of multilingual and immigrant youth.…”
Section: Teaching Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After developing their knowledge and district capacity, courageous leaders can apply their expertise to consider how to design more equitable language policies and, importantly, to confront ideological debates (Heineke et al, 2012), including myths around language development, immigration, and testing. For instance, the recent iterations of federal legislation require certain test scores and demonstration of academic achievement growth for children who speak languages other than English; this means educators often view them as difficult “liabilities” (DeMatthews et al, 2017), as Triton’s teachers on the south and west sides of town did. Courageous leaders are willing to explicitly discuss such concerns and rework ideologies or structures.…”
Section: Teaching Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Anderson (2009) notes, advocacy leadership considers the populations with the least political power and resources and builds alliances across groups (e.g., teachers, parents, unions, community leaders, civil rights groups) to achieve desired outcomes. For example, the superintendent of a large urban district along the U.S. Mexico border leveraged the power of middle and upper class native English-speaking families who were interested in DL education to advocate for this model across the district (DeMatthews, Izquierdo, & Knight, 2017). Additive goals become part of the vision and mission of schools and districts and serve as tenets for developing and sustaining equitable educational opportunities.…”
Section: Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%