“…Numerous studies document how accountability policies, at times, triggered: (a) teaching to the test, narrowing curriculum, and the de-professionalizing the teaching profession (Dee & Jacob, 2011;Reback, Rockoff, & Schwartz, 2014;Valli & Buese, 2007;Watanabe, 2007); (b) a medical model approach to identifying students deemed just below performance cut-offs (commonly referred to as "bubble kids") and "treating" them via targeted "interventions" at the expense of both lower and higher performing students (Amrein-Beardsley, 2009;Booher-Jennings, 2005;Nichols & Berliner, 2005); (c) a loss of trust with families coupled with a growing sense of disengagement in educational governance processes (Rhodes, 2015); (d) harsh and exclusionary disciplinary policies that prioritize compliance and docility to minimize classroom disruption or the strategic discipline of low-performing students during testing windows (Figlio, 2006;Thompson & Allen, 2012); (e) reshaping student testing pools by removing, improperly promoting or demoting students, or pushing students out of school (Cullen & Reback, 2006;Vasquez Heilig & Darling-Hammond, 2008); (f) teacher turnover (Clotfelter, Ladd, Vigdor, & Diaz, 2004;Feng, Figlio, & Sass, 2018); and (g) cheating or tampering with testing materials (Amrein-Beardsley, Berliner, & Rideau, 2010. The media and law enforcement agencies have examined numerous instances of cheating. For example, a former superintendent of the El Paso Independent School District (EPISD) was convicted with several district and school-based administrators for participating in a cheating scheme where students of Mexican descent (many of whom were English Language Learners (ELLs) were improperly promoted, demoted, or pushed out of school to avoid taking standardized tests (DeMatthews, Izquierdo, & Knight, 2017;El Paso Times, 2017). In Atlanta, teachers and administrators were convicted and sent to prison for participating in a cheating scandal that inflated test scores (Blinder, 2015).…”