“…This indicates limiting the owner's authority to act in order to achieve his legitimate interest, as if he were a minor and it was stipulated that he not act in order to protect him from his lack of experience and incomplete maturity. Conversely, if we take the second meaning, which is that the idea of assignment in kind means that it is the taking out of the money that is prevented being acted upon from the dealing department [ 37 ], this money becomes unfit to be a subject of financial rights, i.e., as some say, money is printed in kind, which is that it is inalienable [ 3 , 23 ].…”