2009
DOI: 10.1080/13613320903364499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rights, social cohesion and identity: arguments for and against state‐funded Muslim schools in Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even while accounting for its origins in the troubled geopolitics of the Middle East and the region's fractured relations with the West, the liberalÁradical opponents of faithbased education have striven throughout the first decade of the twenty-first century to emblematise 9/11 as the classic expression of religious toxicity: a violent cocktail of fundamentalism, superstition, fanaticism and intolerance symptomatic of the intrinsic evils of organised religion and justification enough for its erasure from the institutions of public education in the name of reason and democratic pluralism (Tinker 2009). Although these campaigns have for the most part proved unsuccessful, they have brought unprecedented levels of attention to the content of learning and teaching in religious schools.…”
Section: Critics Of Faith-based Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even while accounting for its origins in the troubled geopolitics of the Middle East and the region's fractured relations with the West, the liberalÁradical opponents of faithbased education have striven throughout the first decade of the twenty-first century to emblematise 9/11 as the classic expression of religious toxicity: a violent cocktail of fundamentalism, superstition, fanaticism and intolerance symptomatic of the intrinsic evils of organised religion and justification enough for its erasure from the institutions of public education in the name of reason and democratic pluralism (Tinker 2009). Although these campaigns have for the most part proved unsuccessful, they have brought unprecedented levels of attention to the content of learning and teaching in religious schools.…”
Section: Critics Of Faith-based Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet research evidence suggests that faith-based schools provide standard mainstream education similar to, and in some cases better than, their secular counterparts (Parker-Jenkins et al, 2005;Tinker, 2006;Flint, 2009). To this end, Tinker (2006) cites Barabara Lal's 'ethnicity paradox' hypothesis, which is that being confident about one's ethnic identity would help them become active and productive citizens. A further argument is that rather than religious divisions, it is socioeconomic and class divisions which are translated geographically in the UK, and which pose a much bigger challenge to social integration.…”
Section: Thinking About Religious Welfare: Some Key Dimensions Of Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings reported in this paper originate from research (undertaken by CT) examining the debate about the state-funding of Muslim schools (Tinker 2006(Tinker , 2009. A qualitative research design was favoured to enable an in-depth consideration of the outlooks of research participants on this potentially controversial topic (Mason 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eleven state-funded Muslim schools are required to employ fully qualified teachers and follow the National Curriculum for England. Those in the independent sector (like all independent schools) need not follow these requirements, but nevertheless some choose to (Tinker 2009) while others claim they have insufficient resources to do so (Walford 2001).…”
Section: Muslim Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation