Rigid Body Response of a Mach 2 Shock Train to Downstream Forcing

Edelman, Louis M.; Gamba, Mirko

doi:10.2514/6.2018-3542

2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference 2018

DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3542

|View full text |Cite|

Rigid Body Response of a Mach 2 Shock Train to Downstream Forcing

Louis M. Edelman

Mirko Gamba

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At this frequency range the shock train moves as a quasi-rigid body since the time delay between the head and tail of the shock train is negligible [14]. A study by Jiao at al.…”

mentioning

confidence: 93%

Shock Train Response to High-Frequency Backpressure Forcing

Gillespie

Sandham

2022

AIAA Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerical simulations are performed to study the effect of back pressure disturbances on a shock train. The basic problem consists of a shock train within a constant-area channel with a = 2 inflow and a back pressure applied to the outlet. By subjecting the shock train to different fixed back pressures, it is shown that the shock train length varies linearly with back pressure, while the shock spacing is conserved. Through back pressure step forcing it is shown that the response of the shocks, after an initial lag, is largely determined by the magnitude of the step change. Step increases in back pressure cause upstream shock movements with higher shock pressures. The opposite response occurs with back pressure decreases. With sinusoidal back pressure forcing the shock train oscillates at the applied forcing frequency. The forcing

show abstract

“…At this frequency range the shock train moves as a quasi-rigid body since the time delay between the head and tail of the shock train is negligible [14]. A study by Jiao at al.…”

mentioning

confidence: 93%

Shock Train Response to High-Frequency Backpressure Forcing

Gillespie

Sandham

2022

AIAA Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Rigid Body Response of a Mach 2 Shock Train to Downstream Forcing

Cited by 1 publication

References 12 publications

Shock Train Response to High-Frequency Backpressure Forcing

Shock Train Response to High-Frequency Backpressure Forcing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About