2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.91.032124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigidity percolation by next-nearest-neighbor bonds on generic and regular isostatic lattices

Abstract: We study rigidity percolation transitions in two-dimensional central-force isostatic lattices, including the square and the kagome lattices, as next-nearest-neighbor bonds ("braces") are randomly added to the system. In particular, we focus on the differences between regular lattices, which are perfectly periodic, and generic lattices with the same topology of bonds but whose sites are at random positions in space. We find that the regular square and kagome lattices exhibit a rigidity percolation transition wh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crossover is controlled by the central-force isostatic point (CFIP), at which the degrees of freedom and central-force constraints balance and the system is at the verge of mechanical instability. The CFIP occurs when z = 2d where z is the average coordination number at the crosslinks and d is the spatial dimension [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In a network where at most two fibers meet at a crosslink, z < 2d (dangling ends are removed because they don't contribute to elasticity) and the linear elastic moduli depend on the bending stiffness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crossover is controlled by the central-force isostatic point (CFIP), at which the degrees of freedom and central-force constraints balance and the system is at the verge of mechanical instability. The CFIP occurs when z = 2d where z is the average coordination number at the crosslinks and d is the spatial dimension [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In a network where at most two fibers meet at a crosslink, z < 2d (dangling ends are removed because they don't contribute to elasticity) and the linear elastic moduli depend on the bending stiffness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, as in purely 2D systems, floppy modes in origami are more likely to involve boundary quads (22,23); indeed, corner quads are an extreme example as they can bend without involving any quads in the bulk. Therefore, rigidifying the boundaries first might be the most efficient way to rigidify the whole system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we show below, all parallelogram tilings have a mean coordination hzi ¼ 2d and are thus Maxwell networks (note that we limit ourselves to tilings where all edges are "complete," i.e., nodes of a parallelogram merge with nodes of the neighboring parallelogram when they are tiled together, instead of sitting in the middle of the edge of other parallelograms). Here we extend the notion of Maxwell lattices to "Maxwell networks" to include aperiodic networks with hzi ¼ 2d [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Jammed packings of frictionless spheres [50] and Mikado fiber networks [51,52] are both examples of Maxwell networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%