2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigorous, empirical, and quantitative: a proposed pipeline for soil health assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total health score was then calculated from the unweighted mean of all twelve ratings. Perspectives on the nature of soil health assessment and health indicators continues to evolve [ 10 ]. The soil properties in the CASH framework have been used extensively to assess the impacts of soil management practices on soil function [ 7 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total health score was then calculated from the unweighted mean of all twelve ratings. Perspectives on the nature of soil health assessment and health indicators continues to evolve [ 10 ]. The soil properties in the CASH framework have been used extensively to assess the impacts of soil management practices on soil function [ 7 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil health is monitored using biological, physical, and chemical indicators that correspond with these functions [3][4][5]. Ideally, indicators should be directly linked to soil function, interpretable, and exhibit a dynamic response to management practices [6][7][8][9][10]. The soil microbiome has considerable potential to serve in this capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is a relative scarcity of empirical evidence to link SHI measurements with vital soil functions such as nutrient mineralization or desired agroecosystem outcomes such as yield or nutrient loss reduction (Fine et al, 2017). A single or even several SHI is unlikely to provide a completeassessment of soil health (Wade et al, 2022), though increasing the number of SHI (e.g., a total of 44 SHI in our study) may capture the complexity of the relationships among SHI and management treatments (Bünemann et al, 2018). On the other hand, biological SHI are often laborintensive and/or costly.…”
Section: Associations Of Soil Health Indicators With Maize Yield and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is closely related to soil quality and productivity, but is more integrative and focused on soil biology (Lal, 2016). Soil biology is a challenging phenomenon to map through indicators (Wade et al, 2022), especially compared to well-established methods for chemical (Gibbons et al, 2014) and physical (Hartge and Horn, 2009) soil quantification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%