Proceedings of the 48th Design Automation Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2024724.2024728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigorous model-based design & verification flow for in-vehicle software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is highly desirable to validate CPS design as early as possible. However, the existing CPS design tools stay at the domain-specific levels [4], [10], [26], and this inhibits the possibility of appropriately handling the cross-cutting concerns that characterize CPS. For example, the early design of an automotive requires an experienced designer with a broad multidomain knowledge to manually make decisions such as: Should the control be implemented in a traditional continuous-domain architecture or in an E/E hybrid-domain architecture?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is highly desirable to validate CPS design as early as possible. However, the existing CPS design tools stay at the domain-specific levels [4], [10], [26], and this inhibits the possibility of appropriately handling the cross-cutting concerns that characterize CPS. For example, the early design of an automotive requires an experienced designer with a broad multidomain knowledge to manually make decisions such as: Should the control be implemented in a traditional continuous-domain architecture or in an E/E hybrid-domain architecture?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%