2000
DOI: 10.1007/s12119-000-1027-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman: Politically Incorrect—scientifically Correct

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Little appears to have changed since then, although there has been a relatively recent review of such scientific studies of normal childhood sexual behaviour as have been conducted (de Graaf and Rademakers 2011). What we do have evidence for in abundance is that research into child sexuality has become so controversial that it is almost impossible to conduct, and that this work tends to be marginalised or actively censored (Hubbard and Verstraete 2013;Lilienfeld 2002;Oellerich 2000;Rind et al 2000). Indeed, the very concept of "child sexuality" is increasingly presented as an oxymoron (Angelides 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little appears to have changed since then, although there has been a relatively recent review of such scientific studies of normal childhood sexual behaviour as have been conducted (de Graaf and Rademakers 2011). What we do have evidence for in abundance is that research into child sexuality has become so controversial that it is almost impossible to conduct, and that this work tends to be marginalised or actively censored (Hubbard and Verstraete 2013;Lilienfeld 2002;Oellerich 2000;Rind et al 2000). Indeed, the very concept of "child sexuality" is increasingly presented as an oxymoron (Angelides 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To question this hypothesis is heretical anathema, it has evolved into more of a quasi-religious dogma than a scientific hypothesis subject to revision. The case of Rind et al, where for the first time the U.S. Congress condemned a scientific investigation, is illustrative of this assumed omnipotence in the Western world and most especially in the United States (Lilienfeld, 2002a, b;Mirkin, 2000;Oellerich, 2000;Rind, Bauserman, & Tromovitch, 2000;Wakefield, 2006a). These actions suggest that the CSA hypothesis, like the hypothesis of masturbation that preceded it, is largely a question of social and moral perception (Furedi, 2002;Malón, 2004), whose definitive resolution will not so much depend exclusively on scientific data, but on a major change in cultural paradigms regarding the erotic dimensions of human nature.…”
Section: The Two Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reiterate, to recognize and study the possible participation of the child, even if it includes active collaboration or even initiation, in no way suggests that the child is responsible for what has happened. But questioning what might be the evasion of any moral implications does not mean having to renounce studying the experiences of children where there is clearly voluntary participation from the child and a relationship that he feels is positive, as was demanded by the U.S. congressional ''denunciation'' of Rind et al (1998), a political incursion into science which created a firestorm of controversy (Lilienfeld, 2002;Mirkin, 2000;Oellerich, 2000;Rind, Bauserman, & Tromovitch, 2000; for opposing views, see Ondersma et al, 2001;Spiegel 2000). This does not necessarily mean, from this author's point of view, that these relationships should be legitimized or legalized; there are many elements in this complex question that have not been addressed adequately beyond questionable dogmas of universal ''trauma,'' ''innocence,'' and ''passivity'' on the part of the minors involved.…”
Section: A Different Concept Of Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%