2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring current oxygen ions escaping into the magnetosheath

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
59
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to interpretations of some previous reported events [e.g., Zong et al, 2001], the oxygen ions that we measure, with their large gyroradii, do not appear to be participating in field-aligned escape from the magnetosphere at the same time than are other ions with substantially smaller gyroradii. Zong et al…”
Section: 1002/2016gl070189contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Contrary to interpretations of some previous reported events [e.g., Zong et al, 2001], the oxygen ions that we measure, with their large gyroradii, do not appear to be participating in field-aligned escape from the magnetosphere at the same time than are other ions with substantially smaller gyroradii. Zong et al…”
Section: 1002/2016gl070189contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…with energy of tens to hundreds keV (typically 20-200 keV) are thought to be the main carrier of the ring current energy [Williams, 1981[Williams, , 1983[Williams, , 1985. It is believed that the H + ions are the dominant ion species in the ring current during quiet times, while the O + ions become a significant contributor during geomagnetic activities [e.g., Daglis et al, 1999;Zong et al, 2001]. It has been reported that the O + ions (1-315 keV) could contributed 30-50% of the total ring current energy density during storm time, compared to less than 3% during quiet times Krimigis et al, 1985;Hamilton et al, 1988].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we obtain λ∼3×10 21 s −1 . This value is much smaller than the oxygen ion loss rates across the magnetopause estimated by Seki et al (2001) and Zong et al (2001): ∼10 23 to 10 24 s −1 (the former and the latter assumed the open areas of ∼30 R E 2 and 5 R E 2 , respectively). However, our integration is limited to the high energies (>180 keV), hence the estimation is rather low.…”
Section: Outflow Rates and The Contribution To D St Recoverymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Although the escape via magnetic reconnection at a low latitude during southward Interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) has been reported (Speiser et al, 1981;Daly et al, 1984;Zong et al, 2001), there is little discussion on the escape via magnetic reconnection during northward IMF periods. One exception is the study by Onsager et al (2001) who showed anisotropic phase space densities of ions (without mass discrimination) observed by the Polar spacecraft during northward IMF, and suggested that the ion escape was due to high-latitude reconnection with the closed magnetospheric field lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation