2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.104011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring-down gravitational waves and lensing observables: How far can a wormhole mimic those of a black hole?

Abstract: It has been argued that the recently detected ring-down gravity waveforms could be indicative only of the presence of light rings in a horizonless object, such as a surgical Schwarzschild wormhole, with the frequencies differing drastically from those of the horizon quasinormal mode frequencies ω QNM at late times. While the possibility of such a horizonless alternative is novel by itself, we show by the example of Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole that the differences in ω QNM in the eikonal limit (large l) need not b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A fundamental theoretical distinction between a black hole and a wormhole is that while the former possesses event horizon, the latter does not. Despite this distinction, it is found that many strong field features previously thought of as indicative of a black hole event horizon (e.g., ring-down quasi-normal modes) can be remarkably mimicked by a static wormhole [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A fundamental theoretical distinction between a black hole and a wormhole is that while the former possesses event horizon, the latter does not. Despite this distinction, it is found that many strong field features previously thought of as indicative of a black hole event horizon (e.g., ring-down quasi-normal modes) can be remarkably mimicked by a static wormhole [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To exclude ECO models, one needs calculations of their vibration spectra. These are available for a wide class of objects, including boson stars [86,134,517], gravastars [145,147,258], wormholes [520,521], or other quantum-corrected objects [168,172]. A major challenge in these tests is how to model spin effects properly, since few spinning ECO models are available and the study of their perturbations is much more involved than for Kerr BHs.…”
Section: Qnm Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, precise measurements of the ringdown frequencies and damping times allow one to test whether or not the object is a BH [174,175]. Such tests are in principle feasible for wide classes of objects, including boson stars [80,87,175], gravastars [95,97,139], wormholes [176,177], or other quantum-corrected objects [121,125].…”
Section: Precision Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%