2022
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c07740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring-Opening Dynamics of the Cyclopropyl Radical and Cation: the Transition State Nature of the Cyclopropyl Cation

Abstract: We provide compelling experimental and theoretical evidence for the transition state nature of the cyclopropyl cation. Synchrotron photoionization spectroscopy employing coincidence techniques together with a novel simulation based on high-accuracy ab initio calculations reveal that the cation is unstable via its allowed disrotatory ring-opening path. The ring strains of the cation and the radical are similar, but both ring opening paths for the radical are forbidden when the full electronic symmetries are con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, after modifying the most recent developmental version of the TN, ATcT TN ver. 1.130, 115 to create an updated version 1.130a of the ATcT TN, the resulting ATcT value for the bond dissociation energy of CH became D 0 (CH) = 27 961.0 ± 8.0 cm −1 , a shift downwards by about 10 cm −1 . Noting that this shift is still contained within the combined uncertainties of the original ATcT benchmark (27 971.0 ± 7.3 cm −1 70 ) and the amended ATcT value, the correction of the systematic error in previous computations reduces the difference between the extended HEAT value and the amended ATcT value to 7 cm −1 , which is well within the desired target accuracy of the extended HEAT result.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, after modifying the most recent developmental version of the TN, ATcT TN ver. 1.130, 115 to create an updated version 1.130a of the ATcT TN, the resulting ATcT value for the bond dissociation energy of CH became D 0 (CH) = 27 961.0 ± 8.0 cm −1 , a shift downwards by about 10 cm −1 . Noting that this shift is still contained within the combined uncertainties of the original ATcT benchmark (27 971.0 ± 7.3 cm −1 70 ) and the amended ATcT value, the correction of the systematic error in previous computations reduces the difference between the extended HEAT value and the amended ATcT value to 7 cm −1 , which is well within the desired target accuracy of the extended HEAT result.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Note that the latter determination was included in the subsequent ATcT TN ver. 1.130, 115 further tightening the uncertainty of the ATcT value to AE0.6 cm À1 , without changing the value itself. )…”
Section: Benchmarking the Benchmark And Updating The Atct Thermochemi...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…43−45 Recently, Baraban and co-workers provided a refined high value of 124 ± 0.74 kJ/mol for the allyl−cyclopropyl radical energy difference (cyclization energy) via the Active Thermochemical Tables approach. 46 Combined with the energy barrier value of only 20.67 kcal/mol, 47 the rearrangement of the cyclopropyl radical to the allyl radical could be an energetically favorable process (Scheme 1b). Based on the rearrangement process, the Waser group first reported a ringopening reaction of cyclopropenes after the addition of an azide radical to the strained double bond coupled with the release of dinitrogen, giving the iminyl radical intermediate and finally affording alkenyl nitriles 44 or quinolines 45 (Scheme 1c).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Baraban and co-workers provided a refined high value of 124 ± 0.74 kJ/mol for the allyl–cyclopropyl radical energy difference (cyclization energy) via the Active Thermochemical Tables approach . Combined with the energy barrier value of only 20.67 kcal/mol, the rearrangement of the cyclopropyl radical to the allyl radical could be an energetically favorable process (Scheme b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Q rot is calculated by direct summation using rigid rotor energies and rotational constants from refs and . b Dipole moments from refs , , , and . c Figure of merit ( μ σ / Q rot ( 2 K ) 2 n normalH for laboratory cavity detection and μ 2 σ / Q rot ( 7 K ) 2 n normalH for astronomical detection in TMC-1) relative to phenyl. d Assumed equal to phenyl. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%