2008
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2008.060442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring syndrome: still true?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the growth failure associated with ‘ring syndrome’ has been suggested to be related to haploinsufficiency due to specific deletions within ring chromosomes, rather than a general mechanism due to ring chromosome formation 31. Our data do not support this, since the majority of the 28 patients we studied do not have any detectable deletions of chromosome 20, and the seven patients with deletions have heterogeneous deletions, with no genes that were uniformly deleted in all patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…More recently, the growth failure associated with ‘ring syndrome’ has been suggested to be related to haploinsufficiency due to specific deletions within ring chromosomes, rather than a general mechanism due to ring chromosome formation 31. Our data do not support this, since the majority of the 28 patients we studied do not have any detectable deletions of chromosome 20, and the seven patients with deletions have heterogeneous deletions, with no genes that were uniformly deleted in all patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…However the FISH results on our series revealed only about 1% of monosomic cells in each patient, different to the significantly higher percentage (8%) detected by Elghezal et al [13] but in agreement with the recently reported conclusions weakening the hypothesis of the "ring syndrome" phenotype caused by ring instability [23]. Ring (20) chromosome mosaicism generally represents a de novo event.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Because these four cases show similar phenotypic features to other MDCR positive patients without monosomy, we propose that the pathological traits are not correlated with the monosomy. Indeed, the concept of the ring chromosome syndrome phenotype due to the mosaic state of the ring chromosome has weakened by emerging an array of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data and we cannot exclude the possibility that the ring mosaicism is an artifact of the culture state (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%