2022
DOI: 10.1002/nau.25074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RISE FOR HEALTH: Rationale and protocol for a prospective cohort study of bladder health in women

Ariana L. Smith,
Kyle Rudser,
Bernard L. Harlow
et al.

Abstract: Introduction: The spectrum of bladder health and the factors that promote bladder health and prevent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among women are not well understood. This manuscript describes the rationale, aims, study design, sampling strategy, and data collection for the RISE FOR HEALTH (RISE) study, a novel study of bladder health in women conducted by the Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (PLUS) Research Consortium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ariana Smith MD and coauthors describe the rationale, aims, study design, sampling strategy, and data collection for the RISE study. 6 The authors provide insight into the multiple decisions that are needed to develop and conduct such a large study with longitudinal follow-up and in-person assessments. The construction of the baseline and 1 year follow-up survey rely on existing validated instruments or items whenever possible, with derivation of other items from previous national studies, existing literature, or expert opinion.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ariana Smith MD and coauthors describe the rationale, aims, study design, sampling strategy, and data collection for the RISE study. 6 The authors provide insight into the multiple decisions that are needed to develop and conduct such a large study with longitudinal follow-up and in-person assessments. The construction of the baseline and 1 year follow-up survey rely on existing validated instruments or items whenever possible, with derivation of other items from previous national studies, existing literature, or expert opinion.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six articles in this issue describe the methods of the RISE FOR HEALTH (RISE) study. Arianna Smith MD and coauthors describe the rationale, aims, study design, sampling strategy, and data collection for the RISE study 6 . The authors provide insight into the multiple decisions that are needed to develop and conduct such a large study with longitudinal follow‐up and in‐person assessments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) research consortium is comprised of eight clinical centers and a scientific and data coordinating center focused on advancing science to understand bladder health (BH) and prevent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in adolescent and adult women 9 . The PLUS consortium launched the RISE FOR HEALTH (RISE) national study of BH which includes annual surveys and an in‐person visit 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The PLUS consortium launched the RISE FOR HEALTH (RISE) national study of BH which includes annual surveys and an in-person visit. 10 During RISE study development, the need arose for a process to clearly identify and prioritize which PMs to assess (e.g. levator ani [LA] consisting of the pubovisceral [PV; pubococcygeus], puborectalis, and the iliococcygeus and the obturator internus [OI] muscles) 1,11 in the inperson visit and how to standardize a replicable training approach to PM assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of the overall study are described in a companion manuscript in this issue. 4 After two initial surveys, a nested sample of individuals within the cohort will be eligible to participate in an in-person visit. This sample is included to augment the RISE survey data with physical and biologic factors associated with BH that may be identified as potential areas of study in future intervention trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%