RISE-HEP project part 1: Treatment sequences evaluation in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines.

Abstract

e15663 Background: For over ten years the most stimulating results in systemic therapy for advanced HCC derived from the use of sorafenib (S). But in the last two years several drugs, in particular other multikinase inhibitors like lenvatinib (L), regorafenib (R), cabozantinib (C), proved to be effective both as an alternative or a sequential therapy to sorafenib. In this widened and rapidly increased scenario, without any head-to-head trial, clinicians struggle to define the best drug and the best treatment sequence. Aim of the first part of this project is to evaluate the activity of different treatment sequences in HCC cell lines to pave the way to a future clinical trial investigating their efficacy. Methods: Compounds of S, R, L and C were dissolved in DMSO and aliquoted. HepG2 cell line, obtained from ECACC (Salisbury, UK), was seeded at the density of 3 x 104 cells/ml. After 24 h of incubation, compounds or vehicle (DMSO) were added. Treatments were performed in single administration and six replicates were carried out for each dose. At 48h post-treatment, cells were fixed and stained with acid solution. The absorbance was measured at 520 nm using an ELISA reader (BioTek Instruments, USA). The assay was also performed with the sequences of: S-R, S-C, L-R, L-C (first line treatments for 48h followed by the second compound for 48h). Higher doses than the minimum inhibiting one were tested. Results: S showed superior activity than L as first line compound. In the sequence assay S-C and S-R seems to have the best results in terms of cell viability. After L the best compound appears to be R. See table. Conclusions: Our results showed relevant variations in cell viability with different drug sequences. Already planned analyses in the RISE-HEP project in vivo and in humans are mandatory to confirm which sequence would have the highest efficacy.[Table: see text]