2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rise velocities of single bubbles in a narrow channel between parallel flat plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a dynamical point of view, the bubble's motion is characterised by its drag force F D . It can be computed from the drag coefficient C D = F D /(ρv 2 b S/2), where S = πd 2 3 /4 the equivalent spherical surface and not the true projected area 2bh as often considered (Filella et al 2015;Hashida et al 2019Hashida et al , 2020. At dynamic equilibrium, the drag force F D equals the driving force due to buoyancy F B = ρg(πabh) and so, the model developed in (3.1) gives…”
Section: Drag Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a dynamical point of view, the bubble's motion is characterised by its drag force F D . It can be computed from the drag coefficient C D = F D /(ρv 2 b S/2), where S = πd 2 3 /4 the equivalent spherical surface and not the true projected area 2bh as often considered (Filella et al 2015;Hashida et al 2019Hashida et al , 2020. At dynamic equilibrium, the drag force F D equals the driving force due to buoyancy F B = ρg(πabh) and so, the model developed in (3.1) gives…”
Section: Drag Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to confinement the bubble is flattened between the two cell-plates. Inertial regimes with no de-wetting-that is where the bubble stays separated from the walls by thin liquid films-have been explored concerning in particular hydrodynamics (Collins 1965a, b;Lazarek and Littman 1974;Bessler and Littman 1987;Fan and Tsuchiya 1990;Bush and Eames 1998;Roig et al 2012;Wang et al 2014;Filella et al 2015;Piedra et al 2015;Wang et al 2016;Hashida et al 2019) or mass transfer (Roudet et al 2017;Felis et al 2019;Zhang et al 2020). Indeed, this particular bubble flow configuration is relevant for fundamental investigation of a potentially interesting new bubble reactor configuration of intermediary size as compared to large bubble columns and small size monoliths flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the wake behind the bubble is closed and consists in attached counter-rotating vortices, which have been observed qualitatively many years ago (see for example Collins 1965b). More recently, deformable confined bubbles of intermediary size, with path and shape oscillations, have been studied experimentally (see Roig et al 2012, Filella et al 2015and Hashida et al 2019. In that case, vortex shedding occurs and the wake consists in a periodic vortex street of counterrotating vortices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall effects were investigated rather extensively for bubbles rising through circular tubes [4][5][6] and through narrow rectangular channels [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For circular tubes, wall effects typically cause the elongation of the bubbles in the vertical direction and the alteration of the wake structure behind the rising bubble, resulting in milder bubble deformation and a reduced rise velocity in comparison with the unconfined case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%