2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2019.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risen from the dead: Cardiac stereotactic ablative radiotherapy as last rescue in a patient with refractory ventricular fibrillation storm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a discussion on the proper primary endpoint of such trials is necessary. Currently, there are a growing number of case reports and small retrospective case series in the literature [19,20,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], but only one "phase I/II trial", i.e., pilot-stage clinical investigation which reported results so far [22,23]. The primary endpoint of this single-center trial (NCT02919618) was safety and the authors demonstrated that RA/CRS for VT is feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, a discussion on the proper primary endpoint of such trials is necessary. Currently, there are a growing number of case reports and small retrospective case series in the literature [19,20,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], but only one "phase I/II trial", i.e., pilot-stage clinical investigation which reported results so far [22,23]. The primary endpoint of this single-center trial (NCT02919618) was safety and the authors demonstrated that RA/CRS for VT is feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we added initial technical, pre-clinical, and clinical manuscripts not covered by the search based on our own experience in cardiac radiosurgery in the past 12 years. Evidence was finally extracted from the remaining 42 manuscripts, which include reports on two clinical trials [22,23], two clinical case series [24,25], eight case reports [19,20,[26][27][28][29][30][31], eight preclinical studies [18,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], fourteen technical studies [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53], and eight reviews or opinions [7,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Clinical Trial and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations