Pipelines 2018 2018
DOI: 10.1061/9780784481646.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riser Pipe and Port Design for the Toronto Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Outfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This optimal ratio is influenced by the specific makeup of the sludge, which will differ between WWTPs. Unlike the above mentioned Beenyup WTP, the Ashbridges Bay plant (ABTP) in Toronto, had previously identified a sludge target ratio of 33% to 67% TWAS to PS with 15 days HRT (Toronto Water, 2021). This ratio is believed to be the favorable ratio to accommodate TWAS processing and digester gas production within the ABTP.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This optimal ratio is influenced by the specific makeup of the sludge, which will differ between WWTPs. Unlike the above mentioned Beenyup WTP, the Ashbridges Bay plant (ABTP) in Toronto, had previously identified a sludge target ratio of 33% to 67% TWAS to PS with 15 days HRT (Toronto Water, 2021). This ratio is believed to be the favorable ratio to accommodate TWAS processing and digester gas production within the ABTP.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This optimal ratio is influenced by the specific makeup of the sludge, which will differ between WWTPs. Unlike the above mentioned Beenyup WTP, the Ashbridges Bay plant (ABTP) in Toronto, had previously identified a sludge target ratio of 33% to 67% TWAS to PS with 15 days HRT (Toronto Water, 2021). This ratio is believed to be the favorable ratio to accommodate TWAS processing and digester gas production within the ABTP.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The event resulted in 13 vehicles being stranded in water over 1 m deep (Davies, 2018). Despite the 9 years of green roof development that preceded this event, it still led to a CSO, with Toronto Water reporting a 127,350 m 3 bypass event at Ashbridges Bay correlating to the storm (Toronto Water, 2019). The costs of this flood were ultimately miniscule in comparison to Toronto's costliest rain event which occurred on July 8th, 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%