Rising Inequality and Intergenerational Mobility: The Role of Public Investments in Human Capital

Abstract

One consequence of the rise in inequality witnessed over the past 40 years is its potentially negative impact on intergenerational mobility if parents at the bottom of the income distribution invest significantly less in their children's human capital. I consider whether public investments in children can potentially offset the inequality of private investments. Specifically, examining changes in public spending in 25 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries over the period 2000–2009, I find that increases in spending on health are most strongly associated with reductions in the importance of family background and declines in inequality in the production of child human capital as measured by the Program for International Student Assessment test scores among 15-year-olds. Public spending on family support, housing, and education are also moderately related. In contrast, increased spending on the elderly is associated with increases in the importance of parental background and inequality of child test scores. These results suggest that public investments in child human capital have the potential to offset the potentially negative impact of increasing income inequality on intergenerational mobility and inequality of the next generation. Further research firmly establishing a causal relationship is needed.

Distinctive Mechanisms of Adversity and Socioeconomic Inequality in Child Development: A Review and Recommendations for Evidence-Based Policy

“…These data show that moving to a better neighborhood will result, for the same child, parents, and family income, in long-term higher SES in proportion to the amount of time spent in the better neighborhood. An investigation of whether public spending in 25 countries affected test scores among teens found that increased public spending on health, housing, education, and family support resulted in less inequality in test scores and less of an emphasis on family background in determining these achievement outcomes (Aizer, 2014). The key to the effects observed above is, the earlier the intervention, the better the outcome.…”

Supplemental Security Income and Child Outcomes: Evidence from Birth Weight Eligibility Cutoffs

“…Low birth weight infants born into low-SES families face a particularly steep uphill climb to achieve outcome equality. Fortunately, prior research has shown that both public and private investment can improve outcomes by alleviating credit constraints, improving access to health or education services, and reducing stress (Almond and Currie, 2011;Aizer, 2014;Akee et al, 2018;Currie and Rossin-Slater, 2015;Jones, Milligan, and Stabile, 2015;Aizer et al, 2016;Almond, Currie and Duque, 2017). In this paper we study a particularly vulnerable population-infants born at very low birth weights, below 1200 grams, to mothers with a high school degree or less.…”

Intergenerational mobility and the rise and fall of inequality: Lessons from Latin America

“…However, although the cross country association between income inequality and intergenerational mobility has been investigated extensively (e.g. Aizer, 2014;Andrews and Leigh, 2009;Björklund and Jäntti, 2012;Blanden, 2013;Brunori et al, 2013;Checchi et al, 1999;Corak, 2013b,a;Holter, 2015;Jerrim and Macmillan, 2015), within-country evidence is still rare on this point. The influential works by Chetty et al (2014b,a) use administrative data on income to estimate intergenerational mobility trends across geographical areas in the US.…”