Rising Powers and Multilateral Institutions 2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137397607_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rising Powers and Transnational Private Governance: The International Accounting Standards Board

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Botzem, 2012, Chapter 5;Mattli & Büthe, 2005;Nölke, 2015). The distinction between the three sources of legitimacy can be found, for instance, in Burlaud and Colasse (2011).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Setting Standards For a Worldwide Constituementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Botzem, 2012, Chapter 5;Mattli & Büthe, 2005;Nölke, 2015). The distinction between the three sources of legitimacy can be found, for instance, in Burlaud and Colasse (2011).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Setting Standards For a Worldwide Constituementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This roughly reflects Africa's 5 per cent share of global GDP, but a more detailed analysis reveals that all of these individuals came from South Africa, mostly having worked in the financial industry, large mining corporations and for the national accounting board. While, overall, the composition of IASB governance bodies has been diversified since 2001 through the recruitment and cooptation of individuals from the BRICS (Nölke, ), its African membership is still confined to South Africa. In terms of GDP, however, the contribution of South Africa to total GDP of all African countries, according to World Bank indicators measured in US dollars, has decreased from 22 per cent in 2007 to 14 per cent in 2016, which reflects a shrinking of the South African economy and growth in other parts of Africa like Nigeria and Kenya (own calculations based on World Bank, ).…”
Section: Ifrs In Africa: Increasing Adoption But Continued Underreprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such challenges are particularly an issue for recursive governance schemes because these base their claims for both legitimacy and effectiveness on the involvement of a broad range of regulatory addressees, affected parties and broader publics, together with their responsiveness to these audiences. Existing research emphasizes how power asymmetries, lack of resources and paucity of knowledge deter actors from developing countries from participating in transnational standard‐setting even when procedures for doing so are formally open (Nölke, ). However, less is known about how the conceptual underpinnings of global standards in relation to perceived needs of actors in developing countries might affect the latter's motivation to participate or not.…”
Section: Transnational Standards and The Global Southmentioning
confidence: 99%