2014
DOI: 10.1097/cnq.0000000000000034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rising to the Challenge

Abstract: Published literature on natural disasters describes lessons learned in preparing for disasters, evacuating patients, and caring for patients in the immediate aftermath. Some disasters, however, require longer-term solutions to best meet the health needs of the community during the recovery from the disaster. This article presents an account of one academic medical center's experience in transforming an existing adult burn intensive care unit into an adult and pediatric burn intensive care unit to meet the need… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vast majority of articles that were excluded during screening were anecdotal personal accounts of a health care provider's response to a disaster where no evaluative component was reported. Of the 37 papers included in the analysis, 9 related to infectious disease outbreaks (H1N1 in uenza, Ebola virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome(SARS)) (Table 1) (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20); 19 related to extreme weather events (hurricanes, typhoons, severe storms) (Table 2) (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39), and 10 related to natural disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis) (Table 3) (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49). Twenty-four of the papers (65%) were observational/descriptive papers, seven (19%) were qualitative or mixed-methods case studies, two (5%) reported on survey data, two (5%) on qualitative studies, two (5%) were systematic reviews, and one (2.5%) was a quantitative study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of articles that were excluded during screening were anecdotal personal accounts of a health care provider's response to a disaster where no evaluative component was reported. Of the 37 papers included in the analysis, 9 related to infectious disease outbreaks (H1N1 in uenza, Ebola virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome(SARS)) (Table 1) (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20); 19 related to extreme weather events (hurricanes, typhoons, severe storms) (Table 2) (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39), and 10 related to natural disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis) (Table 3) (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49). Twenty-four of the papers (65%) were observational/descriptive papers, seven (19%) were qualitative or mixed-methods case studies, two (5%) reported on survey data, two (5%) on qualitative studies, two (5%) were systematic reviews, and one (2.5%) was a quantitative study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%