2022
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-168842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-Adapted Therapy Directed According to Response (RADAR, UK-MRA Myeloma XV) - Comparing MRD-Guided Treatment Escalation and De-Escalation Strategies in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Suitable for Stem Cell Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, MRD testing by NGF or NGS, proved to be a more powerful factor in affecting PFS and OS than cytogenetics or ISS stage in several studies [ 121 , 122 ], but it suffers from several issues limiting its incorporation in daily practice. Clinical studies did not definitively clarify neither what the ideal threshold of sensitivity is, the optimal timing for MRD assessment, nor if achievement of MRD negativity has the same value in SR, HR or ultra-high-risk patients, given that the MASTER trial [ 130 ] showed different outcomes in these groups of patients despite MRD negativity. Moreover, the discordance between the achievement of CR according to IMWG criteria [ 120 ] and MRD negativity [ 241 ] should be better explained.…”
Section: Discussion and Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, MRD testing by NGF or NGS, proved to be a more powerful factor in affecting PFS and OS than cytogenetics or ISS stage in several studies [ 121 , 122 ], but it suffers from several issues limiting its incorporation in daily practice. Clinical studies did not definitively clarify neither what the ideal threshold of sensitivity is, the optimal timing for MRD assessment, nor if achievement of MRD negativity has the same value in SR, HR or ultra-high-risk patients, given that the MASTER trial [ 130 ] showed different outcomes in these groups of patients despite MRD negativity. Moreover, the discordance between the achievement of CR according to IMWG criteria [ 120 ] and MRD negativity [ 241 ] should be better explained.…”
Section: Discussion and Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on the significant MRD negativity rates obtained with continuous therapies or through the different phases of treatment, sequential MRD evaluation could better assess the efficacy of each treatment phases, allowing therapy escalation or de-escalation with the aim to minimize toxicity and costs. Ongoing phase III trials [ 88 , 105 , 117 , 129 , 130 ] will enable us to understand if MRD-driven approach will be the right tool to personalize therapy. Early results on the comparison between bone marrow data and peripheral blood MRD assessment by mass spectrometry (MS) seem to be promising—and this and other similar techniques may represent a turning point in the clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussion and Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using sustained MRD negativity to guide maintenance with comparable PFS and OS outcomes in high‐risk patients. Lastly, the UK RADAR (Risk‐Adapted therapy Directed According to Response) trial is a randomised multiarm phase 2/3 study that aims to recruit 1400 patients who will receive lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone (RCyBoRD) based induction followed by HDM and AHCT with subsequent consolidation and maintenance based on cytogenetic risk and MRD status post‐AHCT 81 . In standard risk patients, the study aims to assess the effect of stopping isatuximab maintenance in MRD‐negative patients and the benefit of intensification of consolidation and maintenance with R‐Isa in those with persistent measurable disease.…”
Section: Role Of Maintenance: Conventional Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, considering previous studies have proven that MRD are of great value in adapting chemotherapy and HSCT therapy, MRD assessment also has the potential to guide the adjustment of CAR-T cell therapy strategy. [44] It is worth exploring whether patients with positive MRD should be recommended to undergo more intensive preparative regimens and higher doses of cell infusions compared to MRD-negative patients. However, there is currently limited research data available in this regard.…”
Section: Mrd-directed Car-t-cell Therapy: Enhancing Precision and Eff...mentioning
confidence: 99%