Risk Adjusting Health Care Provider Collaboration Networks

Abstract

Objectives The quality of hospital discharge care and patient factors (health and sociodemographic) impact the rates of unplanned readmissions. This study aims to measure the effects of controlling for the patient factors when using readmission rates to quantify the weighted edges between health care providers in a collaboration network. This improved understanding may inform strategies to reduce hospital readmissions, and facilitate quality-improvement initiatives. Methods We extracted 4 years of patient, provider, and activity data related to cardiology discharge workflow. A Weibull model was developed to predict the risk of unplanned 30-day readmission. A provider–patient bipartite network was used to connect providers by shared patient encounters. We built collaboration networks and calculated the Shared Positive Outcome Ratio (SPOR) to quantify the relationship between providers by the relative rate of patient outcomes, using both risk-adjusted readmission rates and unadjusted readmission rates. The effect of risk adjustment on the calculation of the SPOR metric was quantified using a permutation test and descriptive statistics. Results Comparing the collaboration networks consisting of 2,359 provider pairs, we found that SPOR values with risk-adjusted outcomes are significantly different than unadjusted readmission as an outcome measure (p-value = 0.025). The two networks classified the same provider pairs as high-scoring 51.5% of the time, and the same low scoring provider pairs 85.6% of the time. The observed differences in patient demographics and disease characteristics between high-scoring and low-scoring provider pairs were reduced by applying the risk-adjusted model. The risk-adjusted model reduced the average variation across each individual's SPOR scored provider connections. Conclusions Risk adjusting unplanned readmission in a collaboration network has an effect on SPOR-weighted edges, especially on classifying high-scoring SPOR provider pairs. The risk-adjusted model reduces the variance of providers' connections and balances shared patient characteristics between low- and high-scoring provider pairs. This indicates that the risk-adjusted SPOR edges better measure the impact of collaboration on readmissions by accounting for patients' risk of readmission.

Modeling Care Team Structures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit through Network Analysis of EHR Audit Logs

“…Fourth, the investigation into the EHR provider interaction networks does not consider the patient's health conditions. Although the learned four EHR provider interaction networks correspond to different acuity levels, for instance, the Blue is for chronically ill infants, and Green is for low acuity health conditions (e.g., a convalescing preterm infant), formalized patient risk stratification models 46 are still required to further understand the impact of EHR provider interaction networks on the management of patients.…”

Current Trends in Biomedical and Health Informatics

“…Juárez et al 6 provide a method for data-quality assessment across distributed research networks and Xie et al 7 explore methods for extracting, grouping, ranking, delivering, and displaying medical named entities in radiology reports. Chandler et al 8 and Nair et al 9 provide predictive models for estimating hospital readmission and peak glucose levels in surgical patients respectively, and Alfayez et al 10 evaluate EHR adoption in Saudi Arabia.…”