Risk Allocation in Toll Highway Concessions in Spain: Lessons from Economic Recession

Abstract

Spain has a long tradition of encouraging toll highways by granting concessions to private companies. Concessions in Spain have been characterized by a willingness to transfer considerable risk to the private sector. Traffic demand, acquisition of the right-of-way, and financial risk have often been allocated to the private sector. From 1996 to 2011, 16 toll highway concessions, covering a total distance of 835 km, were awarded by the central government of Spain with this approach. Some of those highways started their operations just before the economic recession began. The recession had negative consequences for Spain's economy. The gross domestic product per capita plummeted, and the unemployment rate increased from 9% to 20% of the working population in just 2 years. The recession also had severe consequences for the economic performance of toll highway concessions. Traffic levels declined at a much greater rate than did the gross domestic product. In addition, the conditions imposed by the financial markets on borrowers became much stricter because of the liquidity crisis. This study analyzes the impact that the economic recession ultimately had on the performance of toll highway concessions in Spain and the actions that the government adopted to avoid the bankruptcy of the concessionaires. It was found that the economic recession helped identify some deficiencies in how risk had been allocated in Spain. The measures that both Spain and the European Union are adopting so as to improve risk allocation are discussed.

Efficiency Assessment of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects: The Case of Russia

“…The government should play a more important role in mitigating risk in order to foster the financial viability of projects that are good for society [59]. Many countries strive to develop and implement various mechanisms for attracting private investments in socially important public projects [54].…”

Economic Recession in Spain: Exploring the Root Causes, Consequences and Recoveries for the Sustainable Economic Growth

“…The 2011 data show the weakness of the recovery, with growth rates of 0.3% and 0.2% in the first and second quarters, respectively [5]. A report prepared by the Bank of Spain claimed that the recovery of Spain will be slow and strongly dependent on the evolution of the broader European economy [60]. Some of the recovery measures that have already been taken by the Spanish government are discussed in the following paragraphs.…”

“…The most important exogenous causes are the price rise of raw materials (such as copper and oil) and the influence of the global financial crisis. The endogenous causes are also two: the real estate bubble that damaged the financial system because of the great exposure of the Spanish banks to mortgages and the limited capacity of Spain to respond to the crisis because of the low productivity of the Spanish workforce, the lack of flexibility in the labor market, and a high level of indebtedness in both the public and the private sectors [60]. Further explanations for the causes of economic recession in Spain are given in the following paragraphs.…”

“…The impact of the economic crisis in Spain has been one of the most severe among the European countries [60]. Due to the economic crisis, government, financial institutions, households and also other corporations and non-financial institutions are highly indebted, unemployment has reached unsustainable heights and the public deficit skyrocketed [34].…”

Impact of public support mechanisms on the performance of public private partnerships : an empirical analysis of road projects in Spain

“…It should be noted that the greater the risks allocated to the private sector, the higher the financial cost of the project. A disproportionate allocation of risk to the private sector can even threaten the financial viability of the project, which might in the end require public support in order to guarantee its ultimate feasibility at the expense of greater risk being assumed by the public sector (Vassallo et al, 2012b).…”