2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Analysis of Grounding Accidents by Mapping a Fault Tree Into a Bayesian Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hazard analysis by Fault Tree Analysis was performed as shown in Figure . The previous Boolean principle was used to identify the underlying cause of dust explosions in Figure …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hazard analysis by Fault Tree Analysis was performed as shown in Figure . The previous Boolean principle was used to identify the underlying cause of dust explosions in Figure …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous Boolean principle was used to identify the underlying cause of dust explosions in Figure 2. 27 Using the diagram, where the hazards are represented by the letters W1−W10 within the rectangles and the fundamental causes are within circles and pentagons represented by the letters A−U, the probability of dust explosion at a tubular oven is shown in eq 1…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic grounding risk analysis methods aim to provide an estimate of the probability or frequency of grounding accidents using accident records and expert judgment. Examples are statistical models (e.g., Ventikos et al, 2017;Youssef et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2018); Bayesian network methods (e.g., Uğurlu et al, 2020;Özlem et al, 2020); Fault tree and event tree methods (e.g., Tunçel et al, 2021;Sakar et al, 2021). These models are useful for the evaluation of the probability of grounding risk from a macro-perspective.…”
Section: Scientific Approaches For Grounding Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid Methodology Risk Scenario [32] AcciMap-ANP Ship grounding accident [33] BN-TRACEr Ship collision [34] ANP-HFACS LPG leakage accident from gas carrier [35] Fuzzy theory-FTA Ship mooring operation [36] FTA-Modified CREAM Oil tanker collision accident [37] BN-TOPSIS Maritime accident prevention [38] FAHP-spatial fuzzy multi-criteria approach Maritime accidents in the South China sea [23] Fuzzy theory-BN Maritime accidents associated with sand carriers [25] FT-ANN-HFACS Maritime accidents associated with sand carriers in coastal waters in China [39] DT-BN Ship oil spill accident [40] FTA-BN Ship grounding accidents [27] ETA-CN Ship grounding accidents [41] SEM-BN Human-related factors in ship grounding accidents [42] FRAM-BN Maritime liquid cargo leakage accidents Lots of complex causal relationships and uncertain risks are involved in shipyard accidents, which can hardly be addressed by statistics-based approaches. Therefore, it is necessary to consider hybrid methodologies to improve the safety management in shipyards by analyzing human-factor-related accidents.…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%