2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and return of online channel adoption in the banking industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies mostly observed the favorable impact of Internet banking on different measures of bank performance. For instance, a positive impact was observed in the context of the US (Brush et al, 2012;DeYoung et al, 2007;Momparler et al, 2012), Spain (Hernando and Nieto, 2007), Italy (Ciciretti et al, 2009), Turkey (Onay and Ozsoz, 2012), Ghana (Ahiadorme, 2018), Kenya (Chipeta and Muthinja, 2018), Jordan (Al-Dmour et al, 2019), China (Dong et al, 2020;He et al, 2020), Iran (Nazaritehrani and Mashali, 2020) and Oman (Al-busaidi and Al-Muharrami, 2021). On the contrary, adverse impacts are also documented in some prior studies in the context of the US (DeYoung, 2005), Europe (Delgado et al, 2007), Italy (Ciciretti et al, 2009), Turkey (Onay and Ozsoz, 2012), Jordan (Al-Smadi, 2011), and China (Chen et al, 2019;Dong et al, 2020;He et al, 2020).…”
Section: Internet Banking Intensity 1607mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies mostly observed the favorable impact of Internet banking on different measures of bank performance. For instance, a positive impact was observed in the context of the US (Brush et al, 2012;DeYoung et al, 2007;Momparler et al, 2012), Spain (Hernando and Nieto, 2007), Italy (Ciciretti et al, 2009), Turkey (Onay and Ozsoz, 2012), Ghana (Ahiadorme, 2018), Kenya (Chipeta and Muthinja, 2018), Jordan (Al-Dmour et al, 2019), China (Dong et al, 2020;He et al, 2020), Iran (Nazaritehrani and Mashali, 2020) and Oman (Al-busaidi and Al-Muharrami, 2021). On the contrary, adverse impacts are also documented in some prior studies in the context of the US (DeYoung, 2005), Europe (Delgado et al, 2007), Italy (Ciciretti et al, 2009), Turkey (Onay and Ozsoz, 2012), Jordan (Al-Smadi, 2011), and China (Chen et al, 2019;Dong et al, 2020;He et al, 2020).…”
Section: Internet Banking Intensity 1607mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Internet banking can affect banks' profitability in two ways-(1) by increasing the revenue or income, and/or (2) by decreasing the costs (Brush et al, 2012). Income can be further sub-divided into two categories namely interest income and non-interest income (He et al, 2020). Internet banking offers several advantages to banks like customers easier access to bank's information and different types of services, faster launching and marketing of banking services, higher customer satisfaction and better customer relationship, and competitive advantage in attracting and retaining customers (Nazaritehrani and Mashali, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bank liquidity management requires an analysis of the level of liquid assets needed for repayment of liabilities over time to provide access to various funding sources for preparing the need for funding and control over compliance with liquidity ratios (He et al 2020).…”
Section: Specifics Of Banking Risk Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Operational Risk Adopting FinTech solutions, such as blockchain, can improve banks' efficiency; however, it may also affect the banks' business by increasing their operational risks [63]. For the banking sector, operational risk mainly refers to the potential for loss due to failure or dysfunction in system reliability and integrity; the associated risks include scalability, security, reversibility, and interoperability [64].…”
Section: Management and Financementioning
confidence: 99%