“…As a result, the institutions, techniques, and technologies that monitor and regulate global fl ows have commanded reinforced academic attention. This is evident from inquiries into a broad range of topics: the discursive and practical regimes that attempt to sketch out the presumable danger from unrestricted movement (e.g., Jackson 2005 ;Balzacq 2011 ;Huysmans 2006 ;; the transformation of borders and border checkpoints in the struggle against (illegal) movement (e.g., Salter 2004 ;Pallitto and Heyman 2008 ;Muller 2009 ;Parizot et al 2014 ); airports and their security regimes as the most symbolic sites of the fi ght against global terror after 9/ 11 (e.g., Adey 2004 ;Leese and Koenigseder 2015 ;Lyon 2006 ;Schouten 2014 ); the practice of information-gathering, databases, and algorithms that inform risk assessments and other forms of anticipation (e.g., Amoore and De Goede 2008 ;Lyon 2003 ;Gandy 2010 ;De Vries 2010 ;Rouvroy 2013 ;Leese 2014 ); or the modes of cooperation and information exchange between security agencies and security professionals (e.g., Bigo et al 2007 ;Balzacq 2008 ;Geyer 2008 ;De Hert and Bellanova 2011 ). This is another list that could be continued, but it suffi ces to illustrate the wide array of inquiries into mobility against the backdrop of the politics of security.…”