Risk Assessment and Secure Accommodation Decision‐Making in Scotland: Taking Account of Gender?

Abstract

Risk assessment has become a key area of focus for child protection practice in recent years. Recent research has begun to identify how risk assessment practices and discourses in social work are gendered, particularly in relation to parenting and offending. There has been less attention paid to how gender impacts upon risk assessment practice with young people who present risks to themselves and/or others. This article begins to address this gap by exploring some of the findings from a recent study of secure accommodation decision‐making in Scotland. The article examines how risk assessment practices on the part of social workers and senior decision makers were influenced by gender discourses. The findings highlight the complexities of taking account of gender within the risk assessment process and the article concludes by making some suggestions for practice. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner MessagesWhen considering a young person for possible placement in secure accommodation, practitioners should ensure that: They undertake a collaborative, holistic, person‐centred risk assessment. This risk assessment must consider how the risks that the young person faces are gendered, without stereotyping. This risk assessment should consider the social and structural factors that have created these risks for young men and women and interventions should also target these wider issues.

Violence, role reversals, and turning points: work identity at stake at a therapeutic residential institution for adolescents

“…She is aggressive, has a weapon, and apparently has planned her action. Girls placed in residential institutions have often been portrayed as psychologically fragile and vulnerable victims, something that has often been problematic because the institutions are organised on the basis of control, not care (Andersson Vogel, 2017;Roesch-Marsh, 2014). Although Alex further emphasises that he and his co-workers stayed calm, the violence escalates.…”

The Ecology of Judgement: A Model for Understanding and Improving Social Work Judgements

“…Much of the decision making in social work is done, formally or informally, in groups (White and Stancombe, 2003;White and Featherstone, 2005;Taylor and White, 2001;Gillingham and Humphreys, 2010;Forkby and Hojer, 2011;Roesch-Marsh, 2011;Roesch-Marsh, 2013;Smith, 2014). From informal chats at the photocopier, to structured multi-disciplinary group decision making fora such as Child Protection Case conferences, the complexity of decision making and the procedural context compels us to seek out the advice and support of others.…”

Professional relationships and decision making in social work: Lessons from a Scottish case study of secure accommodation decision making

“…This article will explore what the study uncovered about the importance of the relationships between the professionals who are part of the decision making system. Themes relating to group decision making theory and power, young people's perspectives and interpreting young people's behaviour and needs, and gender and risk in decision making have been explored in other publications and will not be rehearsed again here (Roesch-Marsh 2013.…”