2008
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals ‐ Revision of Guidance Document under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/4145/2000 – final of 25 September 2002) ‐ Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals

Abstract: In the course of the revision it became apparent that the task embraced several risk management issues that are not within EFSA's and the PPR Panel's remit. Therefore, the PPR Panel has adopted a two-stage approach and first has prepared the present 'Scientific Opinion on the Science behind the Guidance Document (GD) on risk assessment for birds and mammals' using a modular approach. In the second stage, a joint working group of representatives from EFSA, the European Commission and Member States will consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(248 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will not speculate further on this point, but in our study, in the orchards with the most intensive agricultural treatments (including the use of plant protection products), shrews were not trapped. The susceptibility of shrews to pesticide exposure, “that can be oral via direct consumption and watering or grooming, trophic transfer, inhalation, and/or dermal contact” [ 84 ], justified the suitability of shrews as a focal species for risk assessment of plant protection products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will not speculate further on this point, but in our study, in the orchards with the most intensive agricultural treatments (including the use of plant protection products), shrews were not trapped. The susceptibility of shrews to pesticide exposure, “that can be oral via direct consumption and watering or grooming, trophic transfer, inhalation, and/or dermal contact” [ 84 ], justified the suitability of shrews as a focal species for risk assessment of plant protection products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In repeated-dose studies, animals are dosed every day at the same level, which is not the case in the field. The change in exposure can be modelled using the time-weighted exposure concentrations [3]; some specific recommendations were provided in the opinion of the EFSA Panel [19] that served as a background for the Guidance. The time required for observing relevant symptoms is usually not considered in regulatory assessments but is essential for modelling population effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%