Risk assessment for handling hazardous substances within the European industry: Available methodologies and research streams

Peron, Mirco; Arena, Simone; Paltrinieri, Nicola; Sgarbossa, Fabio; Boustras, Georgios

doi:10.1111/risa.14010

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 268 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fire accidents in buildings can be attributed to either a hazardous event or a failure of protection systems. First, a hazardous event occurs when the building does not satisfy fire safety standards and specifications [40]. This could be attributed to the failure to follow the fire safety specification or the inadequacy of the standards and specifications.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Fire Safety Assessment Model for Buildings Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Alfalah,

Al-Shalwi,

Elshaboury

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fires pose significant risks, encompassing loss of life, destruction of property, and substantial adverse impacts on the economy. Therefore, the prioritization of fire safety in building structures must be embraced by all relevant stakeholders, including building owners, authorities, and the general public. However, traditional fire safety assessment methods can be laborious and challenging, impeding the identification of potential fire hazards and the selection of optimal fire safety measures. To this end, this research study offers an analytic hierarchy process for assessing building fire safety. Two case studies are presented to support this model’s outperformance compared with conventional assessment techniques. The proposed method yields hazard ratings of 5.3 and 4.3 along with safety ratings of 5.5 and 5.9 for the two case studies. Additionally, the proposed model yields comprehensible, well-documented, and comparable results. Therefore, it serves as a valuable decision-making tool for evaluating fire hazards and enhancing the efficiency of building structures. As a result, decision-makers can identify current and future fire protection and prevention requirements with greater ease and precision, making the decision-making process more effective.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Fire Safety Assessment Model for Buildings Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Alfalah,

Al-Shalwi,

Elshaboury

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…FMEA is a simple method that especially low-education employees can participate in and understand the process. It is a method widely used in various sectors such as automotive, manufacturing, food, chemistry, and product design [74,[76][77][78][79][80].…”

Section: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Fmea)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Analysis in the Food Cold Chain Using Decomposed Fuzzy Set-Based FMEA Approach

Arslan,

Karakurt,

Cem

et al. 2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Risk analysis is employed across various domains, including the increasingly vital food supply chain, particularly highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study focuses on applying decomposed fuzzy sets (DFS), a novel extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, within the context of the food cold chain. The objective is to develop “Decomposed Fuzzy Set-Based FMEA (DF FMEA)” by extending the well-known failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method to DFS, to assess risks in the food cold chain. The functional and dysfunctional questions related to the severity, occurrence, and detectability of the identified risks; they were addressed to three experts working on the food cold chain. The purpose is to prevent an inconsistent assignment considering the uncertainty and indecision of decision makers. Due to the implementation of the DF FMEA, the identified risks were prioritized as follows: “Financial Risks” held the highest priority, followed by “Delivery Risks”, “Technological Ability Risks”, “Environmental Risks”, “Quality Risks”, and “Social Risks” with the lowest priority. The study’s practical impact lies in the innovative risk assessment method. By considering decision makers’ preferences and uncertainties, the DF FMEA approach enhances informed decision making. This contributes to a robust framework for addressing risks in the food cold chain, aiding practitioners in more effective risk management.

show abstract

“…Luo et al [10] also found that buy-back contracts can coordinate supply chains under risk aversion. Some researchers performed a scientometric analysis and a comprehensive review about risk aversion (Liang et al [11]) and risk assessment (Peron et al [12]) using management methods. When combing through the above literature, it is not difficult to find that most of the previous studies focused on the risk aversion of traditional supply chain members, or basically had risk aversion behavior in the downstream of the supply chain.…”

Section: Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Green Supply Chain Decision and Management under Manufacturer’s Fairness Concern and Risk Aversion

Cao

Mei

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on the impact of a supply chain manufacturer’s fairness concern and risk aversion on the green supply chain and constructs a two-level green supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. It compares three models: the manufacturer is a risk-neutral and fair-neutral, the manufacturer is a risk-averse and fair-neutral, and the manufacturer is a risk-averse and fair-concerned decision maker. In three cases, this paper examines how the manufacturer’s risk aversion and fairness concerns the impact product green level, retail price, and the wholesale price in the green supply chain. Consumers are sensitive to pricing strategies and product green level. The results are as follows: the manufacturer’s risk aversion leads to an increase in the retailer’s profit, and the manufacturer’s profit decreases with the increase in the risk aversion coefficient. Second, when demand meets certain conditions and the manufacturer has advantageous fairness concerns, the manufacturer benefits from fairness concerns, the retailer’s profit decreases with the manufacturer’s fairness concerns coefficient, and the manufacturer’s risk aversion will lead to a decline in the product green level. Third, when the manufacturer believes that the risk is relatively large, they reduce the technology investment of green products; thus, the fairness concerns of the manufacturer will affect the investment of green products and increase the green level of products. For enterprises: When supply chain members face various risks, they need to consider the specific needs of consumers and other members’ behavioral preferences. They can put forward a more scientific prediction of market demand and rational decision making. For customers: they should not only pay attention to changes in market prices, but should also pay attention to changes in the behavioral preferences of supply chain members, as customers are in line with their own interests based on the choice of high-quality green production.

show abstract

Risk assessment for handling hazardous substances within the European industry: Available methodologies and research streams

Cited by 7 publications

References 268 publications

Development of Fire Safety Assessment Model for Buildings Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Development of Fire Safety Assessment Model for Buildings Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Risk Analysis in the Food Cold Chain Using Decomposed Fuzzy Set-Based FMEA Approach

Green Supply Chain Decision and Management under Manufacturer’s Fairness Concern and Risk Aversion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About