2021
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202124103005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment for Illegal Waste Open Burning

Abstract: The area of Naples and Campania region, in Italy, has been experiencing the dramatic consequences of diffuse open burning of illegal waste, resulting in possible threats to human health. The need of evaluating a risk index of open burning rises from this emergency where it is important quantify the risk to support local stakeholder to intervene timely and effectively order and to prioritize the interventions. Nevertheless, open burning phenomenon is still uncontrolled all over the world, and implies not only i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the hazard is understood as a property of the micro-dump detached from the territorial context (a micro-dump in a deserted area and one located in a populated area are equally hazardous, then their potential dangerousness is exactly the same), the risk associated with the hazard instead expresses the hazard contextualized in the geographical context (the associated risk is high if the hazard is located in a populated area while it is negligible if the area is completely deserted). A suitable risk model for assessing fire risk is illustrated in [7]. The factors influencing the risk calculation, retrievable historical data provided by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) and from the Copernicus Land Monitoring Services, are the composition and extension of the micro-dumps (for the evaluation of the hazard), the anthropic use of the territory (for the evaluation of the exposure) and the density of the population (for the evaluation of the impact).…”
Section: Step 3: Environmental Risk Evaluation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the hazard is understood as a property of the micro-dump detached from the territorial context (a micro-dump in a deserted area and one located in a populated area are equally hazardous, then their potential dangerousness is exactly the same), the risk associated with the hazard instead expresses the hazard contextualized in the geographical context (the associated risk is high if the hazard is located in a populated area while it is negligible if the area is completely deserted). A suitable risk model for assessing fire risk is illustrated in [7]. The factors influencing the risk calculation, retrievable historical data provided by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) and from the Copernicus Land Monitoring Services, are the composition and extension of the micro-dumps (for the evaluation of the hazard), the anthropic use of the territory (for the evaluation of the exposure) and the density of the population (for the evaluation of the impact).…”
Section: Step 3: Environmental Risk Evaluation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside these substantial but rather infrequent events, there is the widespread practice of burning waste on a regular basis, as a means of waste disposal, especially in developing countries, contributing to a slow and insidious environmental pollution (Ferronato and Torretta, 2019;IPEN, 2021). However, the backyard burning of waste and setting dumpsites on fire, while less frequent, is still present in the US and EU as well (Muñoz and Panero, 2006;Mihai et al, 2019;Buzzo et al, 2021), requiring burning bans and other measures in order to curb these practices (e.g., EC, 2009;WDHS, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%