2018
DOI: 10.1111/idj.12401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment for the spread of Candida sp. in dental chair unit waterlines using molecular techniques

Abstract: Several types of yeasts were identified; the most frequently isolated genus was Candida. The majority of these yeasts had the ability to form biofilms and resisted antifungal agents used in this study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fungi have also been found in water from dental units. In a study conducted by Mazari et al [24], 18 dental waterlines were analyzed for the presence of yeasts on their internal surfaces. Of the 18 DUWLs studied, 10 were contaminated (55.56%).…”
Section: Microbial Contamination Of Duwls and Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungi have also been found in water from dental units. In a study conducted by Mazari et al [24], 18 dental waterlines were analyzed for the presence of yeasts on their internal surfaces. Of the 18 DUWLs studied, 10 were contaminated (55.56%).…”
Section: Microbial Contamination Of Duwls and Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms up to 50-mm thick have been found in functioning dental units, composed of complex microbial communities (Porteous et al, 2011). Yeasts once identified in DUWL especially Candida can form biofilms and resist antifungal agents (Mazari et al, 2018). As a result, no matter how various procedures were applied, none of these can stop biofilm from accumulating and detaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water from DU has also been discovered to contain fungi. In a study directed by (Mazari et al, 2018), 18 dental waterlines were assayed for the existence of yeasts in their internal areas. Of the 18 DUWLs studied, 10 were polluted (55.56%).…”
Section: Microbial Contamination Of Duwls and Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%