2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment methodology for onboard hydrogen storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such process is also linked to the generation of CO2 emission, which fades the concept of "green hydrogen production" [10]. Aside from that, safety issues related to the physical hydrogen storage by compression and cooling means are also focus of discussion because of the very high pressure level (up to 700 to 800 bar) or very low temperatures (-252 ºC) required [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such process is also linked to the generation of CO2 emission, which fades the concept of "green hydrogen production" [10]. Aside from that, safety issues related to the physical hydrogen storage by compression and cooling means are also focus of discussion because of the very high pressure level (up to 700 to 800 bar) or very low temperatures (-252 ºC) required [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistics of accidents with CNG (compressed natural gas) vehicles shows that more than 1/3 of a total number of tank ruptures in a ¦re is due to pressure relief device failure. Volume of storage tanks ranges from 20 to 140 l. The risk of hydrogen-powered vehicles is above the acceptable level of 10 −5 if the onboard storage tank has ¦re resistance rating below 47 min for example of London roads [1]. This accounts for nonzero probability of thermally activated pressure relief device (TPRD) failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much has been written in recent years about the future of hydrogen as an alternative to fossil fuels [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and the challenges that ensue concerning safety aspects involving hydrogen containment or storage. These safety aspects are also of great importance in the context of nuclear decommissioning operations where hydrogen issues arise due to the corrosion of nuclear waste [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic pressure of the cloud explosion was found to be of similar order to the overpressure and the explosion/flame region approximately 1.25 times the original width of the cloud. Dadashzadeh et al [2] have recently provided a risk assessment methodology for onboard hydrogen-powered vehicle storage. The fire risk is defined in terms of "cost of human life per vehicle fire, and annual fatality rate per vehicle".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%