2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-02917-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules with integrated molecular testing and repeat biopsy: a surgical decision-oriented tool

Abstract: Background The preoperative diagnosis of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) is very challenging. In this study, we aim to provide an integrated risk assessment for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology to guide surgical decision-making, which includes results of blood tests, molecular tests, and repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Methods The study retrospectively included 265 ITNs between June 2019 and April 2022. Ac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a variety of biomarkers have been used clinically, such as RAS mutation, RET/PTC rearrangement, and PAX8-PPARγ rearrangement [ 47 ]. Considerable progress has been made in the continuous development of molecular testing platforms, including Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) and ThyroSeq v3, which are currently the two main thyroid molecular classifiers with proven clinical efficacy, but both have some limitations, such as low specificity, low positive predictive value, or high price [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a variety of biomarkers have been used clinically, such as RAS mutation, RET/PTC rearrangement, and PAX8-PPARγ rearrangement [ 47 ]. Considerable progress has been made in the continuous development of molecular testing platforms, including Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) and ThyroSeq v3, which are currently the two main thyroid molecular classifiers with proven clinical efficacy, but both have some limitations, such as low specificity, low positive predictive value, or high price [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%