“…By using an in situ bioassessment approach, Maltby et al (2000) demonstrated receiving water toxicity and ecological degradation that were consistent with the results of WET tests performed on the point source discharge and concluded that systematic approach provides a comprehensive and ecologically relevant database for assessing the ecological risk posed by point source discharges, so that by applying a set of complementary diagnostic tools, resource managers and dischargers would gain greater confidence in the permit limits set for effluents and the methods used to monitor compliance. Quite a large number of specific research studies of ecotoxicity of industrial effluents using conventional toxicity tests combined with chemical quality assessment, were conducted world-wide, such as, for instance, in Portugal (Mendonca et al 2007), Spain (Rodriguez et al 2006), UK (Tinsley et al 2004), Italy (Guerra 2001), Netherlands (Tonkes et al 1999), Turkey (Sponza 2002), Lithuania and Estonia (Manusadzianas et al 2003), Argentina (Gomez et al 2001;Di Marzio et al 2005), Brasil (Araujo et al 2005) and South Korea (Ra et al 2006a). The conclusion from all the cited studies, which stands for our research as well, is that clear environmental benefit can be delivered by targeting the use of effluent bioassays at catchments with well defined water quality problems, where ecotoxicity from complex effluents is expected to be a contributing factor, despite compliance with chemical limits.…”