2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-022-00898-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of floor water inrush based on TOPSIS combined weighting model: a case study in a coal mine, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 analyzes the related works that have been studied to generate CROWM according to the following characteristics: calculation of weights (objective or not); techniques employed; use of communalities in performance evaluation; advantages and disadvantages; presence or absence of PCA validation tests; consideration of non-beneficial criteria in the PCA; and, finally, whether they can generate performance evaluation of the alternatives. Regarding the generation of criteria weights, the analysis of methods that combine PCA and MCDA can be divided into approaches based on the DM's assessment and those that use objective weights, like KPCA-TOPSIS [48], PCA-TOPSIS [54], PCA-PROMETHEE [57], WIRI [52] and P-SPCA, P-PFA, and P-SRD [50]. This distinction is crucial, as objective methods focus exclusively on the data, free from subjective influences, which is necessary to ensure an unbiased and evidence-based analysis.…”
Section: The Crowm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 analyzes the related works that have been studied to generate CROWM according to the following characteristics: calculation of weights (objective or not); techniques employed; use of communalities in performance evaluation; advantages and disadvantages; presence or absence of PCA validation tests; consideration of non-beneficial criteria in the PCA; and, finally, whether they can generate performance evaluation of the alternatives. Regarding the generation of criteria weights, the analysis of methods that combine PCA and MCDA can be divided into approaches based on the DM's assessment and those that use objective weights, like KPCA-TOPSIS [48], PCA-TOPSIS [54], PCA-PROMETHEE [57], WIRI [52] and P-SPCA, P-PFA, and P-SRD [50]. This distinction is crucial, as objective methods focus exclusively on the data, free from subjective influences, which is necessary to ensure an unbiased and evidence-based analysis.…”
Section: The Crowm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AT mainly plays a role in blocking the sandstone fissure water above the coal seam [30]. However, due to the disturbance of mining, the roof will continuously collapse and generate induced fractures resulting in a decrease in the water resistance of the waterproof layer.…”
Section: Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%