2005
DOI: 10.1080/17429140500246153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment ofBacillus thuringiensisin wildBrassica rapa:A field simulation of introgressed transgenes

Abstract: Brassica crops are able to hybridize with closely related wild and weedy species such as Brassica rapa and therefore these species could become recipients of transgenes from GM brassica crops, such as oilseed rape. Transgenes which protect against herbivory, such as a gene conferring the production of a Bt toxin, could increase the recipient's fitness and therefore enhance its competitiveness. We used microbial Bt and several other pesticides to exclude several guilds of herbivores and thus simulate the effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome of this experiment is not inevitably higher seed output in the mock-inoculated group because the wild relative may be naturally immune to the pathogen, or may tolerate infection and show no reduction in seed production (Maule et al, 2007;Raybould and Cooper, 2005). In the case of introgression of insect resistance transgenes, the wild relative of the crop could be protected from insect attack with insecticides to simulate the effect of transgenic resistance (e.g., Raybould et al, 1999;Sutherland and Poppy, 2005). Another approach is to assume that the transgene leads to increased seed production and then test the hypothesis that increased seed production does not lead to increased abundance of the wild relative, in other words that the population growth rate is not seed-limited.…”
Section: Testing Risk Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of this experiment is not inevitably higher seed output in the mock-inoculated group because the wild relative may be naturally immune to the pathogen, or may tolerate infection and show no reduction in seed production (Maule et al, 2007;Raybould and Cooper, 2005). In the case of introgression of insect resistance transgenes, the wild relative of the crop could be protected from insect attack with insecticides to simulate the effect of transgenic resistance (e.g., Raybould et al, 1999;Sutherland and Poppy, 2005). Another approach is to assume that the transgene leads to increased seed production and then test the hypothesis that increased seed production does not lead to increased abundance of the wild relative, in other words that the population growth rate is not seed-limited.…”
Section: Testing Risk Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%