2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of resurfacing implant loosening and femur fracture under low-energy impacts taking into account degenerative changes in bone tissues. Computer simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an efficient, discrete method for modelling the mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials. It has been established that such methods have demonstrated themselves extremely well for modelling the mechanical behaviour of biomaterials and metals under dynamic loading at micro-and mesoscales [4][5][6][7]. In MCA, the simulated material is represented as a packing of cellular automata (discrete elements of the same size) interacting with neighbours according to certain rules, which makes it possible to describe its mechanical behaviour as that of an isotropic elastic-plastic body within the framework of the particle approach.…”
Section: Methods Of Movable Cellular Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is an efficient, discrete method for modelling the mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials. It has been established that such methods have demonstrated themselves extremely well for modelling the mechanical behaviour of biomaterials and metals under dynamic loading at micro-and mesoscales [4][5][6][7]. In MCA, the simulated material is represented as a packing of cellular automata (discrete elements of the same size) interacting with neighbours according to certain rules, which makes it possible to describe its mechanical behaviour as that of an isotropic elastic-plastic body within the framework of the particle approach.…”
Section: Methods Of Movable Cellular Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of this method are the possibility of explicitly taking into account a complex hierarchical structure, modelling the failure of the material, and the possibility of implicitly taking into account the fluid in the internal pores and channels. The interstitial fluid is taken into account by dividing the problem to be solved into two sub-problems: 1) description of the mechanical behaviour of the solid matrix; 2) description of the fluid transfer in a porous solid matrix [6]. The solid matrix contains a system of interconnected channels and pores, which are implicitly taken into account.…”
Section: Methods Of Movable Cellular Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, movable cellular automata have been successfully used for modeling heterogeneous materials, including bone tissues at the macroscale and mesoscale [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. In this method, the material is considered an ensemble of discrete elements of the same finite size (movable cellular automata) that interact with each other according to certain rules, which due to many-body interaction forces, describe the deformation behavior of the material as an isotropic elastoplastic body.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation of the used poroelastic models of materials for the bone tissues of the knee joint was performed and published in the authors' previous papers [36,37,44].…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%